kernel_optimize_test/fs/afs/dir_silly.c

283 lines
7.4 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/* AFS silly rename handling
*
* Copyright (C) 2019 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
* - Derived from NFS's sillyrename.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
#include "internal.h"
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
static void afs_silly_rename_success(struct afs_operation *op)
{
_enter("op=%08x", op->debug_id);
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
afs_check_dir_conflict(op, &op->file[0]);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
afs_vnode_commit_status(op, &op->file[0]);
}
static void afs_silly_rename_edit_dir(struct afs_operation *op)
{
struct afs_vnode_param *dvp = &op->file[0];
struct afs_vnode *dvnode = dvp->vnode;
struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(d_inode(op->dentry));
struct dentry *old = op->dentry;
struct dentry *new = op->dentry_2;
spin_lock(&old->d_lock);
old->d_flags |= DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED;
spin_unlock(&old->d_lock);
if (dvnode->silly_key != op->key) {
key_put(dvnode->silly_key);
dvnode->silly_key = key_get(op->key);
}
down_write(&dvnode->validate_lock);
if (test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DIR_VALID, &dvnode->flags) &&
dvnode->status.data_version == dvp->dv_before + dvp->dv_delta) {
afs_edit_dir_remove(dvnode, &old->d_name,
afs_edit_dir_for_silly_0);
afs_edit_dir_add(dvnode, &new->d_name,
&vnode->fid, afs_edit_dir_for_silly_1);
}
up_write(&dvnode->validate_lock);
}
static const struct afs_operation_ops afs_silly_rename_operation = {
.issue_afs_rpc = afs_fs_rename,
.issue_yfs_rpc = yfs_fs_rename,
.success = afs_silly_rename_success,
.edit_dir = afs_silly_rename_edit_dir,
};
/*
* Actually perform the silly rename step.
*/
static int afs_do_silly_rename(struct afs_vnode *dvnode, struct afs_vnode *vnode,
struct dentry *old, struct dentry *new,
struct key *key)
{
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
struct afs_operation *op;
_enter("%pd,%pd", old, new);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op = afs_alloc_operation(key, dvnode->volume);
if (IS_ERR(op))
return PTR_ERR(op);
afs: Fix application of status and callback to be under same lock When applying the status and callback in the response of an operation, apply them in the same critical section so that there's no race between checking the callback state and checking status-dependent state (such as the data version). Fix this by: (1) Allocating a joint {status,callback} record (afs_status_cb) before calling the RPC function for each vnode for which the RPC reply contains a status or a status plus a callback. A flag is set in the record to indicate if a callback was actually received. (2) These records are passed into the RPC functions to be filled in. The afs_decode_status() and yfs_decode_status() functions are removed and the cb_lock is no longer taken. (3) xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus() and xdr_decode_YFSFetchStatus() no longer update the vnode. (4) xdr_decode_AFSCallBack() and xdr_decode_YFSCallBack() no longer update the vnode. (5) vnodes, expected data-version numbers and callback break counters (cb_break) no longer need to be passed to the reply delivery functions. Note that, for the moment, the file locking functions still need access to both the call and the vnode at the same time. (6) afs_vnode_commit_status() is now given the cb_break value and the expected data_version and the task of applying the status and the callback to the vnode are now done here. This is done under a single taking of vnode->cb_lock. (7) afs_pages_written_back() is now called by afs_store_data() rather than by the reply delivery function. afs_pages_written_back() has been moved to before the call point and is now given the first and last page numbers rather than a pointer to the call. (8) The indicator from YFS.RemoveFile2 as to whether the target file actually got removed (status.abort_code == VNOVNODE) rather than merely dropping a link is now checked in afs_unlink rather than in xdr_decode_YFSFetchStatus(). Supplementary fixes: (*) afs_cache_permit() now gets the caller_access mask from the afs_status_cb object rather than picking it out of the vnode's status record. afs_fetch_status() returns caller_access through its argument list for this purpose also. (*) afs_inode_init_from_status() now uses a write lock on cb_lock rather than a read lock and now sets the callback inside the same critical section. Fixes: c435ee34551e ("afs: Overhaul the callback handling") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-05-09 22:16:10 +08:00
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
afs_op_set_vnode(op, 0, dvnode);
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
afs_op_set_vnode(op, 1, dvnode);
op->file[0].dv_delta = 1;
op->file[1].dv_delta = 1;
afs: Fix speculative status fetches [ Upstream commit 22650f148126571be1098d34160eb4931fc77241 ] The generic/464 xfstest causes kAFS to emit occasional warnings of the form: kAFS: vnode modified {100055:8a} 30->31 YFS.StoreData64 (c=6015) This indicates that the data version received back from the server did not match the expected value (the DV should be incremented monotonically for each individual modification op committed to a vnode). What is happening is that a lookup call is doing a bulk status fetch speculatively on a bunch of vnodes in a directory besides getting the status of the vnode it's actually interested in. This is racing with a StoreData operation (though it could also occur with, say, a MakeDir op). On the client, a modification operation locks the vnode, but the bulk status fetch only locks the parent directory, so no ordering is imposed there (thereby avoiding an avenue to deadlock). On the server, the StoreData op handler doesn't lock the vnode until it's received all the request data, and downgrades the lock after committing the data until it has finished sending change notifications to other clients - which allows the status fetch to occur before it has finished. This means that: - a status fetch can access the target vnode either side of the exclusive section of the modification - the status fetch could start before the modification, yet finish after, and vice-versa. - the status fetch and the modification RPCs can complete in either order. - the status fetch can return either the before or the after DV from the modification. - the status fetch might regress the locally cached DV. Some of these are handled by the previous fix[1], but that's not sufficient because it checks the DV it received against the DV it cached at the start of the op, but the DV might've been updated in the meantime by a locally generated modification op. Fix this by the following means: (1) Keep track of when we're performing a modification operation on a vnode. This is done by marking vnode parameters with a 'modification' note that causes the AFS_VNODE_MODIFYING flag to be set on the vnode for the duration. (2) Alter the speculation race detection to ignore speculative status fetches if either the vnode is marked as being modified or the data version number is not what we expected. Note that whilst the "vnode modified" warning does get recovered from as it causes the client to refetch the status at the next opportunity, it will also invalidate the pagecache, so changes might get lost. Fixes: a9e5c87ca744 ("afs: Fix speculative status fetch going out of order wrt to modifications") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-and-reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160605082531.252452.14708077925602709042.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/161961335926.39335.2552653972195467566.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-30 20:47:08 +08:00
op->file[0].modification = true;
op->file[1].modification = true;
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
op->file[0].update_ctime = true;
op->file[1].update_ctime = true;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->dentry = old;
op->dentry_2 = new;
op->ops = &afs_silly_rename_operation;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
trace_afs_silly_rename(vnode, false);
return afs_do_sync_operation(op);
}
/**
* afs_sillyrename - Perform a silly-rename of a dentry
*
* AFS is stateless and the server doesn't know when the client is holding a
* file open. To prevent application problems when a file is unlinked while
* it's still open, the client performs a "silly-rename". That is, it renames
* the file to a hidden file in the same directory, and only performs the
* unlink once the last reference to it is put.
*
* The final cleanup is done during dentry_iput.
*/
int afs_sillyrename(struct afs_vnode *dvnode, struct afs_vnode *vnode,
struct dentry *dentry, struct key *key)
{
static unsigned int sillycounter;
struct dentry *sdentry = NULL;
unsigned char silly[16];
int ret = -EBUSY;
_enter("");
/* We don't allow a dentry to be silly-renamed twice. */
if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED)
return -EBUSY;
sdentry = NULL;
do {
int slen;
dput(sdentry);
sillycounter++;
/* Create a silly name. Note that the ".__afs" prefix is
* understood by the salvager and must not be changed.
*/
slen = scnprintf(silly, sizeof(silly), ".__afs%04X", sillycounter);
sdentry = lookup_one_len(silly, dentry->d_parent, slen);
/* N.B. Better to return EBUSY here ... it could be dangerous
* to delete the file while it's in use.
*/
if (IS_ERR(sdentry))
goto out;
} while (!d_is_negative(sdentry));
ihold(&vnode->vfs_inode);
ret = afs_do_silly_rename(dvnode, vnode, dentry, sdentry, key);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
/* The rename succeeded. */
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
set_bit(AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, &vnode->flags);
d_move(dentry, sdentry);
break;
case -ERESTARTSYS:
/* The result of the rename is unknown. Play it safe by forcing
* a new lookup.
*/
d_drop(dentry);
d_drop(sdentry);
}
iput(&vnode->vfs_inode);
dput(sdentry);
out:
_leave(" = %d", ret);
return ret;
}
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
static void afs_silly_unlink_success(struct afs_operation *op)
{
_enter("op=%08x", op->debug_id);
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
afs_check_dir_conflict(op, &op->file[0]);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
afs_vnode_commit_status(op, &op->file[0]);
afs_vnode_commit_status(op, &op->file[1]);
afs_update_dentry_version(op, &op->file[0], op->dentry);
}
static void afs_silly_unlink_edit_dir(struct afs_operation *op)
{
struct afs_vnode_param *dvp = &op->file[0];
struct afs_vnode *dvnode = dvp->vnode;
_enter("op=%08x", op->debug_id);
down_write(&dvnode->validate_lock);
if (test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DIR_VALID, &dvnode->flags) &&
dvnode->status.data_version == dvp->dv_before + dvp->dv_delta)
afs_edit_dir_remove(dvnode, &op->dentry->d_name,
afs_edit_dir_for_unlink);
up_write(&dvnode->validate_lock);
}
static const struct afs_operation_ops afs_silly_unlink_operation = {
.issue_afs_rpc = afs_fs_remove_file,
.issue_yfs_rpc = yfs_fs_remove_file,
.success = afs_silly_unlink_success,
.aborted = afs_check_for_remote_deletion,
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
.edit_dir = afs_silly_unlink_edit_dir,
};
/*
* Tell the server to remove a sillyrename file.
*/
static int afs_do_silly_unlink(struct afs_vnode *dvnode, struct afs_vnode *vnode,
struct dentry *dentry, struct key *key)
{
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
struct afs_operation *op;
_enter("");
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op = afs_alloc_operation(NULL, dvnode->volume);
if (IS_ERR(op))
return PTR_ERR(op);
afs: Fix application of status and callback to be under same lock When applying the status and callback in the response of an operation, apply them in the same critical section so that there's no race between checking the callback state and checking status-dependent state (such as the data version). Fix this by: (1) Allocating a joint {status,callback} record (afs_status_cb) before calling the RPC function for each vnode for which the RPC reply contains a status or a status plus a callback. A flag is set in the record to indicate if a callback was actually received. (2) These records are passed into the RPC functions to be filled in. The afs_decode_status() and yfs_decode_status() functions are removed and the cb_lock is no longer taken. (3) xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus() and xdr_decode_YFSFetchStatus() no longer update the vnode. (4) xdr_decode_AFSCallBack() and xdr_decode_YFSCallBack() no longer update the vnode. (5) vnodes, expected data-version numbers and callback break counters (cb_break) no longer need to be passed to the reply delivery functions. Note that, for the moment, the file locking functions still need access to both the call and the vnode at the same time. (6) afs_vnode_commit_status() is now given the cb_break value and the expected data_version and the task of applying the status and the callback to the vnode are now done here. This is done under a single taking of vnode->cb_lock. (7) afs_pages_written_back() is now called by afs_store_data() rather than by the reply delivery function. afs_pages_written_back() has been moved to before the call point and is now given the first and last page numbers rather than a pointer to the call. (8) The indicator from YFS.RemoveFile2 as to whether the target file actually got removed (status.abort_code == VNOVNODE) rather than merely dropping a link is now checked in afs_unlink rather than in xdr_decode_YFSFetchStatus(). Supplementary fixes: (*) afs_cache_permit() now gets the caller_access mask from the afs_status_cb object rather than picking it out of the vnode's status record. afs_fetch_status() returns caller_access through its argument list for this purpose also. (*) afs_inode_init_from_status() now uses a write lock on cb_lock rather than a read lock and now sets the callback inside the same critical section. Fixes: c435ee34551e ("afs: Overhaul the callback handling") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-05-09 22:16:10 +08:00
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
afs_op_set_vnode(op, 0, dvnode);
afs_op_set_vnode(op, 1, vnode);
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
op->file[0].dv_delta = 1;
afs: Fix speculative status fetches [ Upstream commit 22650f148126571be1098d34160eb4931fc77241 ] The generic/464 xfstest causes kAFS to emit occasional warnings of the form: kAFS: vnode modified {100055:8a} 30->31 YFS.StoreData64 (c=6015) This indicates that the data version received back from the server did not match the expected value (the DV should be incremented monotonically for each individual modification op committed to a vnode). What is happening is that a lookup call is doing a bulk status fetch speculatively on a bunch of vnodes in a directory besides getting the status of the vnode it's actually interested in. This is racing with a StoreData operation (though it could also occur with, say, a MakeDir op). On the client, a modification operation locks the vnode, but the bulk status fetch only locks the parent directory, so no ordering is imposed there (thereby avoiding an avenue to deadlock). On the server, the StoreData op handler doesn't lock the vnode until it's received all the request data, and downgrades the lock after committing the data until it has finished sending change notifications to other clients - which allows the status fetch to occur before it has finished. This means that: - a status fetch can access the target vnode either side of the exclusive section of the modification - the status fetch could start before the modification, yet finish after, and vice-versa. - the status fetch and the modification RPCs can complete in either order. - the status fetch can return either the before or the after DV from the modification. - the status fetch might regress the locally cached DV. Some of these are handled by the previous fix[1], but that's not sufficient because it checks the DV it received against the DV it cached at the start of the op, but the DV might've been updated in the meantime by a locally generated modification op. Fix this by the following means: (1) Keep track of when we're performing a modification operation on a vnode. This is done by marking vnode parameters with a 'modification' note that causes the AFS_VNODE_MODIFYING flag to be set on the vnode for the duration. (2) Alter the speculation race detection to ignore speculative status fetches if either the vnode is marked as being modified or the data version number is not what we expected. Note that whilst the "vnode modified" warning does get recovered from as it causes the client to refetch the status at the next opportunity, it will also invalidate the pagecache, so changes might get lost. Fixes: a9e5c87ca744 ("afs: Fix speculative status fetch going out of order wrt to modifications") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-and-reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160605082531.252452.14708077925602709042.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/161961335926.39335.2552653972195467566.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-30 20:47:08 +08:00
op->file[0].modification = true;
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
op->file[0].update_ctime = true;
op->file[1].op_unlinked = true;
op->file[1].update_ctime = true;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->dentry = dentry;
op->ops = &afs_silly_unlink_operation;
trace_afs_silly_rename(vnode, true);
afs: Fix silly rename Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-16 00:36:58 +08:00
afs_begin_vnode_operation(op);
afs_wait_for_operation(op);
/* If there was a conflict with a third party, check the status of the
* unlinked vnode.
*/
if (op->error == 0 && (op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT)) {
op->file[1].update_ctime = false;
op->fetch_status.which = 1;
op->ops = &afs_fetch_status_operation;
afs_begin_vnode_operation(op);
afs_wait_for_operation(op);
}
return afs_put_operation(op);
}
/*
* Remove sillyrename file on iput.
*/
int afs_silly_iput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
{
struct afs_vnode *dvnode = AFS_FS_I(d_inode(dentry->d_parent));
struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(inode);
struct dentry *alias;
int ret;
DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(wq);
_enter("%p{%pd},%llx", dentry, dentry, vnode->fid.vnode);
down_read(&dvnode->rmdir_lock);
alias = d_alloc_parallel(dentry->d_parent, &dentry->d_name, &wq);
if (IS_ERR(alias)) {
up_read(&dvnode->rmdir_lock);
return 0;
}
if (!d_in_lookup(alias)) {
/* We raced with lookup... See if we need to transfer the
* sillyrename information to the aliased dentry.
*/
ret = 0;
spin_lock(&alias->d_lock);
if (d_really_is_positive(alias) &&
!(alias->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED)) {
alias->d_flags |= DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED;
ret = 1;
}
spin_unlock(&alias->d_lock);
up_read(&dvnode->rmdir_lock);
dput(alias);
return ret;
}
/* Stop lock-release from complaining. */
spin_lock(&vnode->lock);
vnode->lock_state = AFS_VNODE_LOCK_DELETED;
trace_afs_flock_ev(vnode, NULL, afs_flock_silly_delete, 0);
spin_unlock(&vnode->lock);
afs_do_silly_unlink(dvnode, vnode, dentry, dvnode->silly_key);
up_read(&dvnode->rmdir_lock);
d_lookup_done(alias);
dput(alias);
return 1;
}