AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity
f48d1cf59c
kernel_optimize_test/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h

160 lines
4.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2011 Fujitsu. All rights reserved.
* Written by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License v2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
* License along with this program; if not, write to the
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
* Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA.
*/
#ifndef __DELAYED_TREE_OPERATION_H
#define __DELAYED_TREE_OPERATION_H
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
atomic: use <linux/atomic.h> This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h> (atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h> Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-27 07:09:06 +08:00
#include <linux/atomic.h>
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
#include "ctree.h"
/* types of the delayed item */
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM 1
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM 2
struct btrfs_delayed_root {
spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head node_list;
/*
* Used for delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the
* worker. If the delayed node is inserted into the work queue, we
* drop it from this list.
*/
struct list_head prepare_list;
atomic_t items; /* for delayed items */
Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing them in bulk. As the changes build up, processes kick off worker threads and wait for them to make progress. The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed node, which creates a lot of churn. It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending work and can slow down the commit. This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the operations. We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do more work. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-03-05 06:13:31 +08:00
atomic_t items_seq; /* for delayed items */
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int nodes; /* for delayed nodes */
wait_queue_head_t wait;
};
Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-26 13:07:05 +08:00
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST 0
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY 1
Btrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode The inode reference item is close to inode item, so we insert it simultaneously with the inode item insertion when we create a file/directory.. In fact, we also can handle the inode reference deletion by the same way. So we made this patch to introduce the delayed inode reference deletion for the single link inode(At most case, the file doesn't has hard link, so we don't take the hard link into account). This function is based on the delayed inode mechanism. After applying this patch, we can reduce the time of the file/directory deletion by ~10%. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-26 13:07:06 +08:00
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF 2
Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-26 13:07:05 +08:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node {
u64 inode_id;
u64 bytes_reserved;
struct btrfs_root *root;
/* Used to add the node into the delayed root's node list. */
struct list_head n_list;
/*
* Used to add the node into the prepare list, the nodes in this list
* is waiting to be dealt with by the async worker.
*/
struct list_head p_list;
struct rb_root ins_root;
struct rb_root del_root;
struct mutex mutex;
struct btrfs_inode_item inode_item;
atomic_t refs;
u64 index_cnt;
Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-26 13:07:05 +08:00
unsigned long flags;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int count;
};
struct btrfs_delayed_item {
struct rb_node rb_node;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct list_head tree_list; /* used for batch insert/delete items */
struct list_head readdir_list; /* used for readdir items */
u64 bytes_reserved;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
atomic_t refs;
int ins_or_del;
u32 data_len;
char data[0];
};
static inline void btrfs_init_delayed_root(
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
atomic_set(&delayed_root->items, 0);
Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing them in bulk. As the changes build up, processes kick off worker threads and wait for them to make progress. The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed node, which creates a lot of churn. It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending work and can slow down the commit. This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the operations. We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do more work. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-03-05 06:13:31 +08:00
atomic_set(&delayed_root->items_seq, 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
delayed_root->nodes = 0;
spin_lock_init(&delayed_root->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&delayed_root->wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_root->node_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_root->prepare_list);
}
int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to just accept an fs_info pointer directly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:24 +08:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
const char *name, int name_len,
btrfs: Make btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index take btrfs_inode Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-01-11 02:35:35 +08:00
struct btrfs_inode *dir,
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key, u8 type,
u64 index);
int btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to just accept an fs_info pointer directly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:24 +08:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs: Make btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index take btrfs_inode Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-01-11 02:35:36 +08:00
struct btrfs_inode *dir, u64 index);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(struct inode *inode);
int btrfs_run_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to just accept an fs_info pointer directly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:24 +08:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
Btrfs: flush delayed inodes if we're short on space Those crazy gentoo guys have been complaining about ENOSPC errors on their portage volumes. This is because doing things like untar tends to create lots of new files which will soak up all the reservation space in the delayed inodes. Usually this gets papered over by the fact that we will try and commit the transaction, however if this happens in the wrong spot or we choose not to commit the transaction you will be screwed. So add the ability to expclitly flush delayed inodes to free up space. Please test this out guys to make sure it works since as usual I cannot reproduce. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2012-06-22 02:05:49 +08:00
int btrfs_run_delayed_items_nr(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to just accept an fs_info pointer directly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:24 +08:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int nr);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise There are loads of functions in btrfs that accept a root parameter but only use it to obtain an fs_info pointer. Let's convert those to just accept an fs_info pointer directly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:24 +08:00
void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct inode *inode);
/* Used for evicting the inode. */
btrfs: Make btrfs_remove_delayed_node take btrfs_inode Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-01-11 02:35:39 +08:00
void btrfs_remove_delayed_node(struct btrfs_inode *inode);
btrfs: Make btrfs_kill_delayed_inode_items take btrfs_inode Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-01-11 02:35:38 +08:00
void btrfs_kill_delayed_inode_items(struct btrfs_inode *inode);
Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space is not enough We're running into having 50-100 orphans left over with xfstests 83 because of ENOSPC when trying to start the transaction for the inode update. But in fact, it makes no sense in updating the inode for the new size while we're deleting the stupid thing. This patch fixes this problem. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2012-12-19 14:59:51 +08:00
int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode(struct inode *inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int btrfs_delayed_update_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 15:27:13 +08:00
int btrfs_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, u32 *rdev);
btrfs: Make btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref take btrfs_inode Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-01-11 02:35:37 +08:00
int btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref(struct btrfs_inode *inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
/* Used for drop dead root */
void btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(struct btrfs_root *root);
Btrfs: destroy the items of the delayed inodes in error handling routine the items of the delayed inodes were forgotten to be freed, this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-06-14 16:23:22 +08:00
/* Used for clean the transaction */
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, access fs_info->delayed_root directly This results in btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty and btrfs_destroy_delayed_inode taking an fs_info instead of a root. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:23 +08:00
void btrfs_destroy_delayed_inodes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
Btrfs: destroy the items of the delayed inodes in error handling routine the items of the delayed inodes were forgotten to be freed, this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-06-14 16:23:22 +08:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
/* Used for readdir() */
Btrfs: fix ->iterate_shared() by upgrading i_rwsem for delayed nodes Commit fe742fd4f90f ("Revert "btrfs: switch to ->iterate_shared()"") backed out the conversion to ->iterate_shared() for Btrfs because the delayed inode handling in btrfs_real_readdir() is racy. However, we can still do readdir in parallel if there are no delayed nodes. This is a temporary fix which upgrades the shared inode lock to an exclusive lock only when we have delayed items until we come up with a more complete solution. While we're here, rename the btrfs_{get,put}_delayed_items functions to make it very clear that they're just for readdir. Tested with xfstests and by doing a parallel kernel build: while make tinyconfig && make -j4 && git clean dqfx; do : done along with a bunch of parallel finds in another shell: while true; do for ((i=0; i<4; i++)); do find . >/dev/null & done wait done Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2016-05-21 04:50:33 +08:00
bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list);
void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(struct list_head *del_list,
u64 index);
[readdir] convert btrfs Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-05-23 04:48:09 +08:00
int btrfs_readdir_delayed_dir_index(struct dir_context *ctx,
btrfs: increment ctx->pos for every emitted or skipped dirent in readdir If we process the last item in the leaf and hit an I/O error while reading the next leaf, we return -EIO without having adjusted the position. Since we have emitted dirents, getdents() will return the byte count to the user instead of the error. Subsequent callers will emit the last successful dirent again, and return -EIO again, with the same result. Callers loop forever. Instead, if we always increment ctx->pos after emitting or skipping the dirent, we'll be sure that we won't hit the same one again. When we go to process the next leaf, we won't have emitted any dirents and the -EIO will be returned to the user properly. We also don't need to track if we've emitted a dirent already or if we've changed the position yet. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-11-06 01:26:35 +08:00
struct list_head *ins_list);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
/* for init */
int __init btrfs_delayed_inode_init(void);
void btrfs_delayed_inode_exit(void);
Btrfs: avoid delayed metadata items during commits Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-18 04:14:09 +08:00
/* for debugging */
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, access fs_info->delayed_root directly This results in btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty and btrfs_destroy_delayed_inode taking an fs_info instead of a root. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-23 06:54:23 +08:00
void btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
Btrfs: avoid delayed metadata items during commits Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-18 04:14:09 +08:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 18:12:22 +08:00
#endif
Copy Permalink