forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
net: delete __cpuinit usage from all net files
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0
("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the net/* uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe7bf106eb
commit
013dbb325b
|
@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ void flow_cache_flush_deferred(void)
|
|||
schedule_work(&flow_cache_flush_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __cpuinit flow_cache_cpu_prepare(struct flow_cache *fc, int cpu)
|
||||
static int flow_cache_cpu_prepare(struct flow_cache *fc, int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct flow_cache_percpu *fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu);
|
||||
size_t sz = sizeof(struct hlist_head) * flow_cache_hash_size(fc);
|
||||
|
@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int __cpuinit flow_cache_cpu_prepare(struct flow_cache *fc, int cpu)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __cpuinit flow_cache_cpu(struct notifier_block *nfb,
|
||||
static int flow_cache_cpu(struct notifier_block *nfb,
|
||||
unsigned long action,
|
||||
void *hcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static void iucv_disable(void)
|
|||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __cpuinit iucv_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
|
||||
static int iucv_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
|
||||
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cpumask_t cpumask;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user