forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[BNX2]: Fix minor bug in bnx2_has_work().
It is more correct to get the status block from the bnx2_napi struct instead of the bnx2 struct. It happens that they are the same in this case because we are using the first MSIX vector. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dd201d7b7
commit
1097f5e921
@ -2903,8 +2903,7 @@ bnx2_tx_msix(int irq, void *dev_instance)
|
||||
static inline int
|
||||
bnx2_has_work(struct bnx2_napi *bnapi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bnx2 *bp = bnapi->bp;
|
||||
struct status_block *sblk = bp->status_blk;
|
||||
struct status_block *sblk = bnapi->status_blk;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->rx_cons) ||
|
||||
(bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->hw_tx_cons))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user