forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[POWERPC] Make mmiowb's io_sync preempt safe
If mmiowb() is always used prior to releasing spinlock as Doc suggests, then it's safe against preemption; but I'm not convinced that's always the case. If preemption occurs between sync and get_paca()->io_sync = 0, I believe there's no problem. But in the unlikely event that gcc does the store relative to another register than r13 (as it did with current), then there's a small danger of setting another cpu's io_sync to 0, after it had just set it to 1. Rewrite ppc64 mmiowb to prevent that. The remaining io_sync assignments in io.h all get_paca()->io_sync = 1, which is harmless even if preempted to the wrong cpu (the context switch itself syncs); and those in spinlock.h are while preemption is disabled. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96268889ee
commit
292f86f005
@ -163,8 +163,11 @@ extern void _outsl_ns(volatile u32 __iomem *port, const void *buf, long count);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void mmiowb(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory");
|
||||
get_paca()->io_sync = 0;
|
||||
unsigned long tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__("sync; li %0,0; stb %0,%1(13)"
|
||||
: "=&r" (tmp) : "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, io_sync))
|
||||
: "memory");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user