forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations
While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used non-sleepable allocation masks. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403083543.11552-3-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8cc323d95
commit
29fd189707
|
@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Reclaim modifiers
|
||||
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
* Please note that all the following flags are only applicable to sleepable
|
||||
* allocations (e.g. %GFP_NOWAIT and %GFP_ATOMIC will ignore them).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* %__GFP_IO can start physical IO.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user