forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched: Kill WAKEUP_PREEMPT
Remove the WAKEUP_PREEMPT feature, disabling it doesn't make any sense and its outlived its use by a long long while. Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110729082033.GB12106@zhy Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2b245f89e
commit
2c2efaed9b
|
@ -1095,9 +1095,6 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
|
|||
* narrow margin doesn't have to wait for a full slice.
|
||||
* This also mitigates buddy induced latencies under load.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (delta_exec < sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1233,7 +1230,7 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1 || !sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1)
|
||||
check_preempt_tick(cfs_rq, curr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1899,10 +1896,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
|
|||
if (unlikely(p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
find_matching_se(&se, &pse);
|
||||
update_curr(cfs_rq_of(se));
|
||||
BUG_ON(!pse);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,11 +11,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Should wakeups try to preempt running tasks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPT, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Based on load and program behaviour, see if it makes sense to place
|
||||
* a newly woken task on the same cpu as the task that woke it --
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user