forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free
list_lru_count_node() iterates over all memcgs to get the total number of entries on the node but it can race with memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(), which migrates the entries from a dead cgroup to another. This can return incorrect number of entries from list_lru_count_node(). Fix this by keeping track of entries per node and simply return it in list_lru_count_node(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1498707555-30525-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Alexander Polakov <apolyakov@beget.ru> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
32e4e6d5cb
commit
2c80cd57c7
|
@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct list_lru_node {
|
|||
/* for cgroup aware lrus points to per cgroup lists, otherwise NULL */
|
||||
struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
long nr_items;
|
||||
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
|
||||
|
||||
struct list_lru {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
|
|||
l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item);
|
||||
list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
|
||||
l->nr_items++;
|
||||
nlru->nr_items++;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
|
|||
l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item);
|
||||
list_del_init(item);
|
||||
l->nr_items--;
|
||||
nlru->nr_items--;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -183,15 +185,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_one);
|
|||
|
||||
unsigned long list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long count = 0;
|
||||
int memcg_idx;
|
||||
struct list_lru_node *nlru;
|
||||
|
||||
count += __list_lru_count_one(lru, nid, -1);
|
||||
if (list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) {
|
||||
for_each_memcg_cache_index(memcg_idx)
|
||||
count += __list_lru_count_one(lru, nid, memcg_idx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
nlru = &lru->node[nid];
|
||||
return nlru->nr_items;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_node);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -226,6 +223,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int memcg_idx,
|
|||
assert_spin_locked(&nlru->lock);
|
||||
case LRU_REMOVED:
|
||||
isolated++;
|
||||
nlru->nr_items--;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the lru lock has been dropped, our list
|
||||
* traversal is now invalid and so we have to
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user