forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
drm: add _DRM_CONSISTENT map type
Added a new DRM map type _DRM_CONSISTENT for consistent PCI memory. It uses drm_pci_alloc/free for allocating/freeing the memory. From: Felix Kuhling <fxkuehl@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f179bc77d0
commit
2d0f9eaff8
@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ typedef enum drm_map_type {
|
||||
_DRM_REGISTERS = 1, /**< no caching, no core dump */
|
||||
_DRM_SHM = 2, /**< shared, cached */
|
||||
_DRM_AGP = 3, /**< AGP/GART */
|
||||
_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER = 4 /**< Scatter/gather memory for PCI DMA */
|
||||
_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER = 4, /**< Scatter/gather memory for PCI DMA */
|
||||
_DRM_CONSISTENT = 5, /**< Consistent memory for PCI DMA */
|
||||
} drm_map_type_t;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -180,7 +180,22 @@ int drm_addmap( struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
|
||||
}
|
||||
map->offset += dev->sg->handle;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case _DRM_CONSISTENT:
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* dma_addr_t is 64bit on i386 with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G,
|
||||
* As we're limit the address to 2^32-1 (or lses),
|
||||
* casting it down to 32 bits is no problem, but we
|
||||
* need to point to a 64bit variable first. */
|
||||
dma_addr_t bus_addr;
|
||||
map->handle = drm_pci_alloc(dev, map->size, map->size,
|
||||
0xffffffffUL, &bus_addr);
|
||||
map->offset = (unsigned long)bus_addr;
|
||||
if (!map->handle) {
|
||||
drm_free(map, sizeof(*map), DRM_MEM_MAPS);
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
drm_free( map, sizeof(*map), DRM_MEM_MAPS );
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
@ -291,6 +306,9 @@ int drm_rmmap(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
|
||||
case _DRM_AGP:
|
||||
case _DRM_SCATTER_GATHER:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case _DRM_CONSISTENT:
|
||||
drm_pci_free(dev, map->size, map->handle, map->offset);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
drm_free(map, sizeof(*map), DRM_MEM_MAPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ int drm_takedown( drm_device_t *dev )
|
||||
dev->sg = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case _DRM_CONSISTENT:
|
||||
drm_pci_free(dev, map->size,
|
||||
map->handle, map->offset);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
drm_free(map, sizeof(*map), DRM_MEM_MAPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ static int drm__vm_info(char *buf, char **start, off_t offset, int request,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hardcoded from _DRM_FRAME_BUFFER,
|
||||
_DRM_REGISTERS, _DRM_SHM, _DRM_AGP, and
|
||||
_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER. */
|
||||
const char *types[] = { "FB", "REG", "SHM", "AGP", "SG" };
|
||||
_DRM_SCATTER_GATHER and _DRM_CONSISTENT */
|
||||
const char *types[] = { "FB", "REG", "SHM", "AGP", "SG", "PCI" };
|
||||
const char *type;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -229,9 +229,12 @@ static int drm__vm_info(char *buf, char **start, off_t offset, int request,
|
||||
if (dev->maplist != NULL) list_for_each(list, &dev->maplist->head) {
|
||||
r_list = list_entry(list, drm_map_list_t, head);
|
||||
map = r_list->map;
|
||||
if(!map) continue;
|
||||
if (map->type < 0 || map->type > 4) type = "??";
|
||||
else type = types[map->type];
|
||||
if(!map)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (map->type < 0 || map->type > 5)
|
||||
type = "??";
|
||||
else
|
||||
type = types[map->type];
|
||||
DRM_PROC_PRINT("%4d 0x%08lx 0x%08lx %4.4s 0x%02x 0x%08lx ",
|
||||
i,
|
||||
map->offset,
|
||||
|
@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ static void drm_vm_shm_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
case _DRM_AGP:
|
||||
case _DRM_SCATTER_GATHER:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case _DRM_CONSISTENT:
|
||||
drm_pci_free(dev, map->size, map->handle,
|
||||
map->offset);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
drm_free(map, sizeof(*map), DRM_MEM_MAPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -645,6 +649,9 @@ int drm_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
vma->vm_ops = &drm_vm_ops;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case _DRM_SHM:
|
||||
case _DRM_CONSISTENT:
|
||||
/* Consistent memory is really like shared memory. It's only
|
||||
* allocate in a different way */
|
||||
vma->vm_ops = &drm_vm_shm_ops;
|
||||
vma->vm_private_data = (void *)map;
|
||||
/* Don't let this area swap. Change when
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user