forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Btrfs: fix wrong file extent length
There are two types of the file extent - inline extent and regular extent, When we log file extents, we didn't take inline extent into account, fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca46963718
commit
315a9850da
|
@ -3263,6 +3263,7 @@ int btrfs_lookup_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
struct btrfs_path *path, u64 objectid,
|
||||
u64 bytenr, int mod);
|
||||
u64 btrfs_file_extent_length(struct btrfs_path *path);
|
||||
int btrfs_csum_file_blocks(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ struct btrfs_csum_item *btrfs_lookup_csum(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
return ERR_PTR(ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
int btrfs_lookup_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
struct btrfs_path *path, u64 objectid,
|
||||
|
@ -151,6 +150,26 @@ int btrfs_lookup_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
u64 btrfs_file_extent_length(struct btrfs_path *path)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int extent_type;
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
|
||||
u64 len;
|
||||
|
||||
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
|
||||
extent_type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], fi);
|
||||
|
||||
if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG ||
|
||||
extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC)
|
||||
len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(path->nodes[0], fi);
|
||||
else if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE)
|
||||
len = btrfs_file_extent_inline_len(path->nodes[0], fi);
|
||||
else
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
|
||||
return len;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3143,7 +3143,6 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
struct btrfs_path *dst_path, struct log_args *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_root *log = root->log_root;
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
|
||||
struct btrfs_key key;
|
||||
u64 start = em->mod_start;
|
||||
u64 search_start = start;
|
||||
|
@ -3199,10 +3198,7 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
}
|
||||
} while (key.offset > start);
|
||||
|
||||
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
|
||||
num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(path->nodes[0],
|
||||
fi);
|
||||
num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_length(path);
|
||||
if (key.offset + num_bytes <= start) {
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
@ -3211,8 +3207,7 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
args->src = path->nodes[0];
|
||||
next_slot:
|
||||
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
|
||||
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(args->src, path->slots[0],
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
|
||||
num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_length(path);
|
||||
if (args->nr &&
|
||||
args->start_slot + args->nr == path->slots[0]) {
|
||||
args->nr++;
|
||||
|
@ -3230,7 +3225,6 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
}
|
||||
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]);
|
||||
path->slots[0]++;
|
||||
num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(args->src, fi);
|
||||
if (len < num_bytes) {
|
||||
/* I _think_ this is ok, envision we write to a
|
||||
* preallocated space that is adjacent to a previously
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user