AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

USB: doc patch 1

Browse Source 
Grammar, spelling, and stylistic edits.

Signed-off-by: Sam Bishop <sam@bishop.dhs.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Sam Bishop 2006-08-28 16:42:10 -06:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 39c2f3ac04
commit 3413232692
1 changed files with 44 additions and 54 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

98
Documentation/DocBook/usb.tmpl
View File

@ -43,59 +43,52 @@
<para>A Universal Serial Bus (USB) is used to connect a host,
such as a PC or workstation, to a number of peripheral
devices. USB uses a tree structure, with the host at the
devices. USB uses a tree structure, with the host as the
root (the system's master), hubs as interior nodes, and
peripheral devices as leaves (and slaves).
peripherals as leaves (and slaves).
Modern PCs support several such trees of USB devices, usually
one USB 2.0 tree (480 Mbit/sec each) with
a few USB 1.1 trees (12 Mbit/sec each) that are used when you
connect a USB 1.1 device directly to the machine's "root hub".
</para>
<para>That master/slave asymmetry was designed in part for
ease of use. It is not physically possible to assemble
(legal) USB cables incorrectly: all upstream "to-the-host"
connectors are the rectangular type, matching the sockets on
root hubs, and the downstream type are the squarish type
(or they are built in to the peripheral).
Software doesn't need to deal with distributed autoconfiguration
since the pre-designated master node manages all that.
At the electrical level, bus protocol overhead is reduced by
eliminating arbitration and moving scheduling into host software.
<para>That master/slave asymmetry was designed-in for a number of
reasons, one being ease of use. It is not physically possible to
assemble (legal) USB cables incorrectly: all upstream "to the host"
connectors are the rectangular type (matching the sockets on
root hubs), and all downstream connectors are the squarish type
(or they are built into the peripheral).
Also, the host software doesn't need to deal with distributed
auto-configuration since the pre-designated master node manages all that.
And finally, at the electrical level, bus protocol overhead is reduced by
eliminating arbitration and moving scheduling into the host software.
</para>
<para>USB 1.0 was announced in January 1996, and was revised
<para>USB 1.0 was announced in January 1996 and was revised
as USB 1.1 (with improvements in hub specification and
support for interrupt-out transfers) in September 1998.
USB 2.0 was released in April 2000, including high speed
transfers and transaction translating hubs (used for USB 1.1
USB 2.0 was released in April 2000, adding high-speed
transfers and transaction-translating hubs (used for USB 1.1
and 1.0 backward compatibility).
</para>
<para>USB support was added to Linux early in the 2.2 kernel series
shortly before the 2.3 development forked off. Updates
from 2.3 were regularly folded back into 2.2 releases, bringing
new features such as <filename>/sbin/hotplug</filename> support,
more drivers, and more robustness.
The 2.5 kernel series continued such improvements, and also
worked on USB 2.0 support,
higher performance,
better consistency between host controller drivers,
API simplification (to make bugs less likely),
and providing internal "kerneldoc" documentation.
<para>Kernel developers added USB support to Linux early in the 2.2 kernel
series, shortly before 2.3 development forked. Updates from 2.3 were
regularly folded back into 2.2 releases, which improved reliability and
brought <filename>/sbin/hotplug</filename> support as well more drivers.
Such improvements were continued in the 2.5 kernel series, where they added
USB 2.0 support, improved performance, and made the host controller drivers
(HCDs) more consistent. They also simplified the API (to make bugs less
likely) and added internal "kerneldoc" documentation.
</para>
<para>Linux can run inside USB devices as well as on
the hosts that control the devices.
Because the Linux 2.x USB support evolved to support mass market
platforms such as Apple Macintosh or PC-compatible systems,
it didn't address design concerns for those types of USB systems.
So it can't be used inside mass-market PDAs, or other peripherals.
USB device drivers running inside those Linux peripherals
But USB device drivers running inside those peripherals
don't do the same things as the ones running inside hosts,
and so they've been given a different name:
they're called <emphasis>gadget drivers</emphasis>.
This document does not present gadget drivers.
so they've been given a different name:
<emphasis>gadget drivers</emphasis>.
This document does not cover gadget drivers.
</para>
</chapter>
@ -103,17 +96,14 @@
<chapter id="host">
<title>USB Host-Side API Model</title>
<para>Within the kernel,
host-side drivers for USB devices talk to the "usbcore" APIs.
There are two types of public "usbcore" APIs, targetted at two different
layers of USB driver. Those are
<emphasis>general purpose</emphasis> drivers, exposed through
driver frameworks such as block, character, or network devices;
and drivers that are <emphasis>part of the core</emphasis>,
which are involved in managing a USB bus.
Such core drivers include the <emphasis>hub</emphasis> driver,
which manages trees of USB devices, and several different kinds
of <emphasis>host controller driver (HCD)</emphasis>,
<para>Host-side drivers for USB devices talk to the "usbcore" APIs.
There are two. One is intended for
<emphasis>general-purpose</emphasis> drivers (exposed through
driver frameworks), and the other is for drivers that are
<emphasis>part of the core</emphasis>.
Such core drivers include the <emphasis>hub</emphasis> driver
(which manages trees of USB devices) and several different kinds
of <emphasis>host controller drivers</emphasis>,
which control individual busses.
</para>
@ -122,21 +112,21 @@
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>USB supports four kinds of data transfer
(control, bulk, interrupt, and isochronous). Two transfer
types use bandwidth as it's available (control and bulk),
while the other two types of transfer (interrupt and isochronous)
<listitem><para>USB supports four kinds of data transfers
(control, bulk, interrupt, and isochronous). Two of them (control
and bulk) use bandwidth as it's available,
while the other two (interrupt and isochronous)
are scheduled to provide guaranteed bandwidth.
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>The device description model includes one or more
"configurations" per device, only one of which is active at a time.
Devices that are capable of high speed operation must also support
full speed configurations, along with a way to ask about the
"other speed" configurations that might be used.
Devices that are capable of high-speed operation must also support
full-speed configurations, along with a way to ask about the
"other speed" configurations which might be used.
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>Configurations have one or more "interface", each
<listitem><para>Configurations have one or more "interfaces", each
of which may have "alternate settings". Interfaces may be
standardized by USB "Class" specifications, or may be specific to
a vendor or device.</para>
@ -162,7 +152,7 @@
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>The Linux USB API supports synchronous calls for
control and bulk messaging.
control and bulk messages.
It also supports asynchnous calls for all kinds of data transfer,
using request structures called "URBs" (USB Request Blocks).
</para></listitem>