forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched/uclamp: Fix locking around cpu_util_update_eff()
[ Upstream commit 93b73858701fd01de26a4a874eb95f9b7156fd4b ]
cpu_cgroup_css_online() calls cpu_util_update_eff() without holding the
uclamp_mutex or rcu_read_lock() like other call sites, which is
a mistake.
The uclamp_mutex is required to protect against concurrent reads and
writes that could update the cgroup hierarchy.
The rcu_read_lock() is required to traverse the cgroup data structures
in cpu_util_update_eff().
Surround the caller with the required locks and add some asserts to
better document the dependency in cpu_util_update_eff().
Fixes: 7226017ad3
("sched/uclamp: Fix a bug in propagating uclamp value in new cgroups")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6c2b3d565f
commit
37481ad72d
|
@ -7620,7 +7620,11 @@ static int cpu_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
|
|||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP
|
||||
/* Propagate the effective uclamp value for the new group */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&uclamp_mutex);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
cpu_util_update_eff(css);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&uclamp_mutex);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -7710,6 +7714,9 @@ static void cpu_util_update_eff(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
|
|||
enum uclamp_id clamp_id;
|
||||
unsigned int clamps;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&uclamp_mutex);
|
||||
SCHED_WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held());
|
||||
|
||||
css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, top_css) {
|
||||
uc_parent = css_tg(css)->parent
|
||||
? css_tg(css)->parent->uclamp : NULL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user