WMI: simplify handling of returned WMI blocks in parse_wdg()

There is no reason why we allocate memory and copy data into an
intermediate buffer, it is not like we are working with data coming
from userspace.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Torokhov 2010-08-26 00:15:09 -07:00 committed by Matthew Garrett
parent 3d2c63eb5e
commit 378306628e

View File

@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ const struct acpi_buffer *in)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmi_set_block);
static void wmi_dump_wdg(struct guid_block *g)
static void wmi_dump_wdg(const struct guid_block *g)
{
char guid_string[37];
@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static acpi_status parse_wdg(acpi_handle handle)
{
struct acpi_buffer out = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
union acpi_object *obj;
struct guid_block *gblock;
const struct guid_block *gblock;
struct wmi_block *wblock;
char guid_string[37];
acpi_status status;
@ -832,14 +832,9 @@ static acpi_status parse_wdg(acpi_handle handle)
goto out_free_pointer;
}
gblock = (const struct guid_block *)obj->buffer.pointer;
total = obj->buffer.length / sizeof(struct guid_block);
gblock = kmemdup(obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gblock) {
status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
goto out_free_pointer;
}
for (i = 0; i < total; i++) {
/*
Some WMI devices, like those for nVidia hooks, have a
@ -860,7 +855,7 @@ static acpi_status parse_wdg(acpi_handle handle)
wblock = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wmi_block), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wblock) {
status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
goto out_free_gblock;
goto out_free_pointer;
}
wblock->gblock = gblock[i];
@ -872,8 +867,6 @@ static acpi_status parse_wdg(acpi_handle handle)
list_add_tail(&wblock->list, &wmi_blocks.list);
}
out_free_gblock:
kfree(gblock);
out_free_pointer:
kfree(out.pointer);