forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ext4: optimize mballoc for large allocations
The ext4 block allocator only maintains buddy bitmaps for chunks which are less than or equal to one quarter of a block group. That is, for a file aystem with a 1k blocksize, and where the number of blocks in a block group is 8192 blocks, the largest chunk size tracked by buddy bitmaps is 2048 blocks. For a file system with a 4k blocksize, and where the number of blocks in a block group is 32768 blocks, the largest chunk size tracked by buddy bitmaps is 8192 blocks. To work around this code, mballoc.c before this commit would truncate allocation requests to the number of blocks in a block group minus 10. Why 10? Aside from being a completely arbitrary number, it avoids block allocation to be a power of two larger than 25% of the block group. If you try to explicitly fallocate 50% of the block group size, this will demonstrate the problem; the block allocation code will scan the all of the blocks in the file system with cr==0 (since the request is for a natural power of two), but then completely fail for all blocks groups, since the buddy bitmaps don't track chunk sizes of 50% of the block group. To fix this, in these we use ext4_mb_complex_scan_group() instead of ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(). Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8dc0aa8cf0
commit
40ae348762
@ -1884,15 +1884,19 @@ static int ext4_mb_good_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
|
|||||||
case 0:
|
case 0:
|
||||||
BUG_ON(ac->ac_2order == 0);
|
BUG_ON(ac->ac_2order == 0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (grp->bb_largest_free_order < ac->ac_2order)
|
|
||||||
return 0;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Avoid using the first bg of a flexgroup for data files */
|
/* Avoid using the first bg of a flexgroup for data files */
|
||||||
if ((ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA) &&
|
if ((ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA) &&
|
||||||
(flex_size >= EXT4_FLEX_SIZE_DIR_ALLOC_SCHEME) &&
|
(flex_size >= EXT4_FLEX_SIZE_DIR_ALLOC_SCHEME) &&
|
||||||
((group % flex_size) == 0))
|
((group % flex_size) == 0))
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if ((ac->ac_2order > ac->ac_sb->s_blocksize_bits+1) ||
|
||||||
|
(free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
|
||||||
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (grp->bb_largest_free_order < ac->ac_2order)
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return 1;
|
return 1;
|
||||||
case 1:
|
case 1:
|
||||||
if ((free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
|
if ((free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
|
||||||
@ -2007,7 +2011,7 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ac->ac_groups_scanned++;
|
ac->ac_groups_scanned++;
|
||||||
if (cr == 0)
|
if (cr == 0 && ac->ac_2order < sb->s_blocksize_bits+2)
|
||||||
ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
|
ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
|
||||||
else if (cr == 1 && sbi->s_stripe &&
|
else if (cr == 1 && sbi->s_stripe &&
|
||||||
!(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
|
!(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
|
||||||
@ -4005,8 +4009,8 @@ ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
|
|||||||
len = ar->len;
|
len = ar->len;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* just a dirty hack to filter too big requests */
|
/* just a dirty hack to filter too big requests */
|
||||||
if (len >= EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 10)
|
if (len >= EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb))
|
||||||
len = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 10;
|
len = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* start searching from the goal */
|
/* start searching from the goal */
|
||||||
goal = ar->goal;
|
goal = ar->goal;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user