forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
oprofile, x86: Using struct stack_frame for 64bit processes dump
Removing unnecessary struct frame_head and replacing it with struct stack_frame. The struct stack_frame is already defined and used in other places in kernel, so there's no reason to define new structure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef70fcc0cd
commit
40c6b3cb64
@ -48,35 +48,30 @@ static struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
|
||||
.walk_stack = print_context_stack,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct frame_head {
|
||||
struct frame_head *bp;
|
||||
unsigned long ret;
|
||||
} __attribute__((packed));
|
||||
|
||||
static struct frame_head *dump_user_backtrace(struct frame_head *head)
|
||||
static struct stack_frame *dump_user_backtrace(struct stack_frame *head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct frame_head bufhead[2];
|
||||
struct stack_frame bufhead[2];
|
||||
|
||||
/* Also check accessibility of one struct frame_head beyond */
|
||||
/* Also check accessibility of one struct stack_frame beyond */
|
||||
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, head, sizeof(bufhead)))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(bufhead, head, sizeof(bufhead)))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
oprofile_add_trace(bufhead[0].ret);
|
||||
oprofile_add_trace(bufhead[0].return_address);
|
||||
|
||||
/* frame pointers should strictly progress back up the stack
|
||||
* (towards higher addresses) */
|
||||
if (head >= bufhead[0].bp)
|
||||
if (head >= bufhead[0].next_frame)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
return bufhead[0].bp;
|
||||
return bufhead[0].next_frame;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
x86_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct frame_head *head = (struct frame_head *)frame_pointer(regs);
|
||||
struct stack_frame *head = (struct stack_frame *)frame_pointer(regs);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
|
||||
unsigned long stack = kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user