forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
Now that smp_read_barrier_depends() is implied by READ_ONCE(), the several smp_read_barrier_depends() calls may be removed from lib/assoc_array.c. This commit makes this change and marks the READ_ONCE() calls that head address dependencies. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
243d1a7977
commit
516df05061
|
@ -38,12 +38,10 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
|
|||
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(cursor)) {
|
||||
/* Descend through a shortcut */
|
||||
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(cursor);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node);
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
slot = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We perform two passes of each node.
|
||||
|
@ -55,15 +53,12 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
has_meta = 0;
|
||||
for (; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
has_meta |= (unsigned long)ptr;
|
||||
if (ptr && assoc_array_ptr_is_leaf(ptr)) {
|
||||
/* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer
|
||||
* and dereferencing the pointer - but only if we are
|
||||
* actually going to dereference it.
|
||||
/* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer,
|
||||
* which is supplied by the above READ_ONCE().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Invoke the callback */
|
||||
ret = iterator(assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr),
|
||||
iterator_data);
|
||||
|
@ -86,10 +81,8 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
|
|||
|
||||
continue_node:
|
||||
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
|
||||
for (; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_meta(ptr)) {
|
||||
cursor = ptr;
|
||||
goto begin_node;
|
||||
|
@ -98,16 +91,15 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
|
|||
|
||||
finished_node:
|
||||
/* Move up to the parent (may need to skip back over a shortcut) */
|
||||
parent = READ_ONCE(node->back_pointer);
|
||||
parent = READ_ONCE(node->back_pointer); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
slot = node->parent_slot;
|
||||
if (parent == stop)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(parent)) {
|
||||
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(parent);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
cursor = parent;
|
||||
parent = READ_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer);
|
||||
parent = READ_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
slot = shortcut->parent_slot;
|
||||
if (parent == stop)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -147,7 +139,7 @@ int assoc_array_iterate(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
void *iterator_data),
|
||||
void *iterator_data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct assoc_array_ptr *root = READ_ONCE(array->root);
|
||||
struct assoc_array_ptr *root = READ_ONCE(array->root); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!root)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -194,7 +186,7 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
|
||||
pr_devel("-->%s()\n", __func__);
|
||||
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(array->root);
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(array->root); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
if (!cursor)
|
||||
return assoc_array_walk_tree_empty;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -216,11 +208,9 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
|
||||
consider_node:
|
||||
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
|
||||
slot = segments >> (level & ASSOC_ARRAY_KEY_CHUNK_MASK);
|
||||
slot &= ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_MASK;
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
|
||||
pr_devel("consider slot %x [ix=%d type=%lu]\n",
|
||||
slot, level, (unsigned long)ptr & 3);
|
||||
|
@ -254,7 +244,6 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
cursor = ptr;
|
||||
follow_shortcut:
|
||||
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(cursor);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
pr_devel("shortcut to %d\n", shortcut->skip_to_level);
|
||||
sc_level = level + ASSOC_ARRAY_LEVEL_STEP;
|
||||
BUG_ON(sc_level > shortcut->skip_to_level);
|
||||
|
@ -294,7 +283,7 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
} while (sc_level < shortcut->skip_to_level);
|
||||
|
||||
/* The shortcut matches the leaf's index to this point. */
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node);
|
||||
cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
if (((level ^ sc_level) & ~ASSOC_ARRAY_KEY_CHUNK_MASK) != 0) {
|
||||
level = sc_level;
|
||||
goto jumped;
|
||||
|
@ -331,20 +320,18 @@ void *assoc_array_find(const struct assoc_array *array,
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
node = result.terminal_node.node;
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the target key is available to us, it's has to be pointed to by
|
||||
* the terminal node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (slot = 0; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
|
||||
ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
|
||||
if (ptr && assoc_array_ptr_is_leaf(ptr)) {
|
||||
/* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer
|
||||
* and dereferencing the pointer - but only if we are
|
||||
* actually going to dereference it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
leaf = assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr);
|
||||
smp_read_barrier_depends();
|
||||
if (ops->compare_object(leaf, index_key))
|
||||
return (void *)leaf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user