forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
jffs2: Improve post-mount CRC scan efficiency
We need to finish doing the CRC checks before we can allow writes to happen, and we currently process the inodes in order. This means a call to jffs2_get_ino_cache() for each possible inode# up to c->highest_ino. There may be a lot of lookups which fail, if the inode# space is used sparsely. And the inode# space is *often* used sparsely, if a file system contains a lot of stuff that was put there in the original image, followed by lots of creation and deletion of new files. Instead of processing them numerically with a lookup each time, just walk the hash buckets instead. [fix locking typo reported by Dan Carpenter] Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d267aefc54
commit
5817b9dc9c
|
@ -134,38 +134,60 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|||
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&c->alloc_sem))
|
||||
return -EINTR;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
/* We can't start doing GC until we've finished checking
|
||||
the node CRCs etc. */
|
||||
int bucket, want_ino;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
||||
if (!c->unchecked_size)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can't start doing GC yet. We haven't finished checking
|
||||
the node CRCs etc. Do it now. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* checked_ino is protected by the alloc_sem */
|
||||
if (c->checked_ino > c->highest_ino && xattr) {
|
||||
pr_crit("Checked all inodes but still 0x%x bytes of unchecked space?\n",
|
||||
c->unchecked_size);
|
||||
jffs2_dbg_dump_block_lists_nolock(c);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
|
||||
return -ENOSPC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!xattr)
|
||||
xattr = jffs2_verify_xattr(c);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&c->inocache_lock);
|
||||
/* Instead of doing the inodes in numeric order, doing a lookup
|
||||
* in the hash for each possible number, just walk the hash
|
||||
* buckets of *existing* inodes. This means that we process
|
||||
* them out-of-order, but it can be a lot faster if there's
|
||||
* a sparse inode# space. Which there often is. */
|
||||
want_ino = c->check_ino;
|
||||
for (bucket = c->check_ino % c->inocache_hashsize ; bucket < c->inocache_hashsize; bucket++) {
|
||||
for (ic = c->inocache_list[bucket]; ic; ic = ic->next) {
|
||||
if (ic->ino < want_ino)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
ic = jffs2_get_ino_cache(c, c->checked_ino++);
|
||||
if (ic->state != INO_STATE_CHECKEDABSENT &&
|
||||
ic->state != INO_STATE_PRESENT)
|
||||
goto got_next; /* with inocache_lock held */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ic) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping ino #%u already checked\n",
|
||||
ic->ino);
|
||||
}
|
||||
want_ino = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Point c->check_ino past the end of the last bucket. */
|
||||
c->check_ino = ((c->highest_ino + c->inocache_hashsize + 1) &
|
||||
~c->inocache_hashsize) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_crit("Checked all inodes but still 0x%x bytes of unchecked space?\n",
|
||||
c->unchecked_size);
|
||||
jffs2_dbg_dump_block_lists_nolock(c);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
|
||||
return -ENOSPC;
|
||||
|
||||
got_next:
|
||||
/* For next time round the loop, we want c->checked_ino to indicate
|
||||
* the *next* one we want to check. And since we're walking the
|
||||
* buckets rather than doing it sequentially, it's: */
|
||||
c->check_ino = ic->ino + c->inocache_hashsize;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ic->pino_nlink) {
|
||||
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping check of ino #%d with nlink/pino zero\n",
|
||||
ic->ino);
|
||||
|
@ -176,8 +198,6 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|||
switch(ic->state) {
|
||||
case INO_STATE_CHECKEDABSENT:
|
||||
case INO_STATE_PRESENT:
|
||||
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping ino #%u already checked\n",
|
||||
ic->ino);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -196,7 +216,7 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|||
ic->ino);
|
||||
/* We need to come back again for the _same_ inode. We've
|
||||
made no progress in this case, but that should be OK */
|
||||
c->checked_ino--;
|
||||
c->check_ino = ic->ino;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
|
||||
sleep_on_spinunlock(&c->inocache_wq, &c->inocache_lock);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct jffs2_sb_info {
|
|||
struct mtd_info *mtd;
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t highest_ino;
|
||||
uint32_t checked_ino;
|
||||
uint32_t check_ino; /* *NEXT* inode to be checked */
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int flags;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -846,8 +846,8 @@ int jffs2_thread_should_wake(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
|
|||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (c->unchecked_size) {
|
||||
jffs2_dbg(1, "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): unchecked_size %d, checked_ino #%d\n",
|
||||
c->unchecked_size, c->checked_ino);
|
||||
jffs2_dbg(1, "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): unchecked_size %d, check_ino #%d\n",
|
||||
c->unchecked_size, c->check_ino);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user