forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sh: intc: Prefer IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE over a dummy set_wake callback.
It's possible to use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to get the behaviour that we're after, without having to bother with a dummy ->set_wake() callback for the IRQ chip. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5fbebcbdb3
commit
5bbda4e4ac
|
@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ static void intc_disable(struct irq_data *data)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int intc_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0; /* allow wakeup, but setup hardware in intc_suspend() */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is held with the irq desc lock held, so we don't require any
|
||||
|
@ -225,8 +220,8 @@ struct irq_chip intc_irq_chip = {
|
|||
.irq_disable = intc_disable,
|
||||
.irq_shutdown = intc_disable,
|
||||
.irq_set_type = intc_set_type,
|
||||
.irq_set_wake = intc_set_wake,
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
.irq_set_affinity = intc_set_affinity,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user