AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function

Browse Source 
All references to sev_active() were moved to arch/x86 so we don't need to
define it for s390 anymore.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
This commit is contained in:
Thiago Jung Bauermann 2019-08-06 01:49:19 -03:00 committed by Michael Ellerman
parent ae7eb82a92
commit 5cbdaeefb6
2 changed files with 1 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
View File

@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
extern bool sev_active(void);
int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);

7
arch/s390/mm/init.c
View File

@ -156,14 +156,9 @@ int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
}
/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
bool sev_active(void)
{
return is_prot_virt_guest();
}
bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return sev_active();
return is_prot_virt_guest();
}
/* protected virtualization */