From 61ebd0d0ae097c3d644904baef73abd86dafd351 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lawall Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 18:08:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: timers: drop documentation about LB_BIAS The LB_BIAS feature was removed in commit 1c1b8a7b03ef ("sched/fair: Replace source_load() & target_load() with weighted_cpuload()"), so drop the mention that it is disabled in the no_hz case. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595088518-28116-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst b/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst index 065db217cb04..c4c70e1aada3 100644 --- a/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst +++ b/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ not come for free: slightly differently than those for non-adaptive-tick CPUs. This might in turn perturb load-balancing of real-time tasks. -6. The LB_BIAS scheduler feature is disabled by adaptive ticks. - Although improvements are expected over time, adaptive ticks is quite useful for many types of real-time and compute-intensive applications. However, the drawbacks listed above mean that adaptive ticks should not