forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
dmaengine: edma: check for echan->edesc => NULL in edma_dma_pause()
I added book keeping of whether or not the 8250-dma driver has an RX transfer pending or not so we don't BUG here if it calls dmaengine_pause() on a channel which has not a pending transfer. Guess what, this is not enough. The following can be triggered with a busy RX channel and hackbench in background: - DMA transfer completes. The callback is delayed via vchan_cookie_complete() into a tasklet so it das not happen asap. - hackbench keeps the system busy so the tasklet does not run "soon". - the UART collected enough data and generates an "timeout"-interrupt. Since 8250-dma *thinks* the DMA-transfer is still pending it tries to cancel it via invoking dmaengine_pause() first. This causes the segfault because echan->edesc is NULL now that the transfer completed (however the callback did not run yet). With this patch we don't BUG in the scenario described. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a52f6e49e
commit
639559ada6
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int edma_slave_config(struct edma_chan *echan,
|
||||
static int edma_dma_pause(struct edma_chan *echan)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Pause/Resume only allowed with cyclic mode */
|
||||
if (!echan->edesc->cyclic)
|
||||
if (!echan->edesc || !echan->edesc->cyclic)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
edma_pause(echan->ch_num);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user