forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
rds: remove unused rds_send_acked_before()
rds_send_acked_before() wasn't blocking interrupts when acquiring c_lock from user context but nothing calls it. Rather than fix its use of c_lock we just remove the function. Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
037f18a307
commit
671202f349
@ -724,7 +724,6 @@ void rds_send_drop_to(struct rds_sock *rs, struct sockaddr_in *dest);
|
||||
typedef int (*is_acked_func)(struct rds_message *rm, uint64_t ack);
|
||||
void rds_send_drop_acked(struct rds_connection *conn, u64 ack,
|
||||
is_acked_func is_acked);
|
||||
int rds_send_acked_before(struct rds_connection *conn, u64 seq);
|
||||
void rds_send_remove_from_sock(struct list_head *messages, int status);
|
||||
int rds_send_pong(struct rds_connection *conn, __be16 dport);
|
||||
struct rds_message *rds_send_get_message(struct rds_connection *,
|
||||
|
@ -404,35 +404,6 @@ static inline int rds_send_is_acked(struct rds_message *rm, u64 ack,
|
||||
return be64_to_cpu(rm->m_inc.i_hdr.h_sequence) <= ack;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Returns true if there are no messages on the send and retransmit queues
|
||||
* which have a sequence number greater than or equal to the given sequence
|
||||
* number.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int rds_send_acked_before(struct rds_connection *conn, u64 seq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rds_message *rm, *tmp;
|
||||
int ret = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&conn->c_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(rm, tmp, &conn->c_retrans, m_conn_item) {
|
||||
if (be64_to_cpu(rm->m_inc.i_hdr.h_sequence) < seq)
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(rm, tmp, &conn->c_send_queue, m_conn_item) {
|
||||
if (be64_to_cpu(rm->m_inc.i_hdr.h_sequence) < seq)
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&conn->c_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is pretty similar to what happens below in the ACK
|
||||
* handling code - except that we call here as soon as we get
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user