forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
drm/i915: fix scheduling while holding the new active list spinlock
regression caused by commit 5e118f4139feafe97e913df67b1f7c1e5083e535: i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive() should be called in task context, as it calls fput(); Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com> [anholt: Add more detail to the comment about the lock break that's added] Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
280b713b5b
commit
68c8434217
|
@ -1596,8 +1596,19 @@ i915_gem_retire_request(struct drm_device *dev,
|
|||
|
||||
if (obj->write_domain != 0)
|
||||
i915_gem_object_move_to_flushing(obj);
|
||||
else
|
||||
else {
|
||||
/* Take a reference on the object so it won't be
|
||||
* freed while the spinlock is held. The list
|
||||
* protection for this spinlock is safe when breaking
|
||||
* the lock like this since the next thing we do
|
||||
* is just get the head of the list again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
drm_gem_object_reference(obj);
|
||||
i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->mm.active_list_lock);
|
||||
drm_gem_object_unreference(obj);
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev_priv->mm.active_list_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->mm.active_list_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user