forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched/deadline: Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
According to global EDF, tasks should be migrated between runqueues without checking if their scheduling deadlines and runtimes are valid. However, SCHED_DEADLINE currently performs such a check: a migration happens doing: deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu); activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0); which ends up calling dequeue_task_dl(), setting the new CPU, and then calling enqueue_task_dl(). enqueue_task_dl() then calls enqueue_dl_entity(), which calls update_dl_entity(), which can modify scheduling deadline and runtime, breaking global EDF scheduling. As a result, some of the properties of global EDF are not respected: for example, a taskset {(30, 80), (40, 80), (120, 170)} scheduled on two cores can have unbounded response times for the third task even if 30/80+40/80+120/170 = 1.5809 < 2 This can be fixed by invoking update_dl_entity() only in case of wakeup, or if this is a new SCHED_DEADLINE task. Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1418813432-20797-2-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
32a8df4e0b
commit
6a503c3be9
@ -826,10 +826,10 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
|
||||
* parameters of the task might need updating. Otherwise,
|
||||
* we want a replenishment of its runtime.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!dl_se->dl_new && flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
|
||||
replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (dl_se->dl_new || flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
|
||||
update_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
|
||||
else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
|
||||
replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
|
||||
|
||||
__enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user