forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
perf: Fix task_function_call() error handling
The error handling introduced by commit:2ed6edd33a
("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()") looses any return value from smp_call_function_single() that is not {0, -EINVAL}. This is a problem because it will return -EXNIO when the target CPU is offline. Worse, in that case it'll turn into an infinite loop. Fixes:2ed6edd33a
("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()") Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com> Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827064732.20860-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
c85fb28b6f
commit
6d6b8b9f4f
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void remote_function(void *data)
|
|||
* retry due to any failures in smp_call_function_single(), such as if the
|
||||
* task_cpu() goes offline concurrently.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns @func return value or -ESRCH when the process isn't running
|
||||
* returns @func return value or -ESRCH or -ENXIO when the process isn't running
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, remote_function_f func, void *info)
|
||||
|
@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, remote_function_f func, void *info)
|
|||
for (;;) {
|
||||
ret = smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function,
|
||||
&data, 1);
|
||||
ret = !ret ? data.ret : -EAGAIN;
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
ret = data.ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user