forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
documentation: Document call_rcu() safety mechanisms and limitations
The call_rcu() family of primitives will take action to accelerate grace periods when the number of callbacks pending on a given CPU becomes excessive. Although this safety mechanism can be useful, it is no substitute for users of call_rcu() having rate-limit controls in place. This commit adds this nuance to the documentation. Reported-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Reported-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d0abeca32
commit
6e67669678
|
@ -256,10 +256,10 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
|
|||
variations on this theme.
|
||||
|
||||
b. Limiting update rate. For example, if updates occur only
|
||||
once per hour, then no explicit rate limiting is required,
|
||||
unless your system is already badly broken. The dcache
|
||||
subsystem takes this approach -- updates are guarded
|
||||
by a global lock, limiting their rate.
|
||||
once per hour, then no explicit rate limiting is
|
||||
required, unless your system is already badly broken.
|
||||
Older versions of the dcache subsystem take this approach,
|
||||
guarding updates with a global lock, limiting their rate.
|
||||
|
||||
c. Trusted update -- if updates can only be done manually by
|
||||
superuser or some other trusted user, then it might not
|
||||
|
@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
|
|||
the machine.
|
||||
|
||||
d. Use call_rcu_bh() rather than call_rcu(), in order to take
|
||||
advantage of call_rcu_bh()'s faster grace periods.
|
||||
advantage of call_rcu_bh()'s faster grace periods. (This
|
||||
is only a partial solution, though.)
|
||||
|
||||
e. Periodically invoke synchronize_rcu(), permitting a limited
|
||||
number of updates per grace period.
|
||||
|
@ -276,6 +277,13 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
|
|||
The same cautions apply to call_rcu_bh(), call_rcu_sched(),
|
||||
call_srcu(), and kfree_rcu().
|
||||
|
||||
Note that although these primitives do take action to avoid memory
|
||||
exhaustion when any given CPU has too many callbacks, a determined
|
||||
user could still exhaust memory. This is especially the case
|
||||
if a system with a large number of CPUs has been configured to
|
||||
offload all of its RCU callbacks onto a single CPU, or if the
|
||||
system has relatively little free memory.
|
||||
|
||||
9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include
|
||||
rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), and
|
||||
list_for_each_safe_rcu(), must be either within an RCU read-side
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user