forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
memcg: move memcg_update_cache_size() to slab_common.c
`While growing per memcg caches arrays, we jump between memcontrol.c and slab_common.c in a weird way: memcg_alloc_cache_id - memcontrol.c memcg_update_all_caches - slab_common.c memcg_update_cache_size - memcontrol.c There's absolutely no reason why memcg_update_cache_size can't live on the slab's side though. So let's move it there and settle it comfortably amid per-memcg cache allocation functions. Besides, this patch cleans this function up a bit, removing all the useless comments from it, and renames it to memcg_update_cache_params to conform to memcg_alloc/free_cache_params, which we already have in slab_common.c. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3bb3043a0
commit
6f817f4cda
|
@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(struct page *page, int order);
|
|||
|
||||
int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
|
||||
|
||||
int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups);
|
||||
void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);
|
||||
|
||||
struct kmem_cache *
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2958,55 +2958,6 @@ void memcg_update_array_size(int num)
|
|||
memcg_limited_groups_array_size = num;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct memcg_cache_params *cur_params = s->memcg_params;
|
||||
struct memcg_cache_params *new_params;
|
||||
size_t size;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
VM_BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s));
|
||||
|
||||
size = num_groups * sizeof(void *);
|
||||
size += offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
|
||||
|
||||
new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!new_params)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
new_params->is_root_cache = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There is the chance it will be bigger than
|
||||
* memcg_limited_groups_array_size, if we failed an allocation
|
||||
* in a cache, in which case all caches updated before it, will
|
||||
* have a bigger array.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* But if that is the case, the data after
|
||||
* memcg_limited_groups_array_size is certainly unused
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; i++) {
|
||||
if (!cur_params->memcg_caches[i])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
new_params->memcg_caches[i] =
|
||||
cur_params->memcg_caches[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ideally, we would wait until all caches succeed, and only
|
||||
* then free the old one. But this is not worth the extra
|
||||
* pointer per-cache we'd have to have for this.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is not a big deal if some caches are left with a size
|
||||
* bigger than the others. And all updates will reset this
|
||||
* anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params);
|
||||
if (cur_params)
|
||||
kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
|
||||
struct kmem_cache *root_cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -148,6 +148,33 @@ static void memcg_free_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s)
|
|||
kfree(s->memcg_params);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int memcg_update_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_memcgs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int size;
|
||||
struct memcg_cache_params *new_params, *cur_params;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s));
|
||||
|
||||
size = offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
|
||||
size += num_memcgs * sizeof(void *);
|
||||
|
||||
new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!new_params)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
cur_params = s->memcg_params;
|
||||
memcpy(new_params->memcg_caches, cur_params->memcg_caches,
|
||||
memcg_limited_groups_array_size * sizeof(void *));
|
||||
|
||||
new_params->is_root_cache = true;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params);
|
||||
if (cur_params)
|
||||
kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kmem_cache *s;
|
||||
|
@ -158,9 +185,8 @@ int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs)
|
|||
if (!is_root_cache(s))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = memcg_update_cache_size(s, num_memcgs);
|
||||
ret = memcg_update_cache_params(s, num_memcgs);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See comment in memcontrol.c, memcg_update_cache_size:
|
||||
* Instead of freeing the memory, we'll just leave the caches
|
||||
* up to this point in an updated state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user