forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
NFS: Don't use DATA_SYNC writes
If we're writing back data, and the FLUSH_STABLE flag is set, then we always want to use NFS_FILE_SYNC, since we're always in a situation where we're doing page reclaim, and so we want to free up the page as quickly as possible. If we're in the FLUSH_COND_STABLE case, then we either want to use another unstable write (if we have to do a commit anyway) or again, we want to use NFS_FILE_SYNC because we know that we have no more pages to write out. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c47abcf8ff
commit
87ed5eb44a
@ -872,10 +872,14 @@ static int nfs_write_rpcsetup(struct nfs_page *req,
|
||||
data->args.context = get_nfs_open_context(req->wb_context);
|
||||
data->args.lock_context = req->wb_lock_context;
|
||||
data->args.stable = NFS_UNSTABLE;
|
||||
if (how & (FLUSH_STABLE | FLUSH_COND_STABLE)) {
|
||||
data->args.stable = NFS_DATA_SYNC;
|
||||
if (!nfs_need_commit(NFS_I(inode)))
|
||||
data->args.stable = NFS_FILE_SYNC;
|
||||
switch (how & (FLUSH_STABLE | FLUSH_COND_STABLE)) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case FLUSH_COND_STABLE:
|
||||
if (nfs_need_commit(NFS_I(inode)))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
data->args.stable = NFS_FILE_SYNC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
data->res.fattr = &data->fattr;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user