forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
locking/lockdep: Improve 'invalid wait context' splat
The 'invalid wait context' splat doesn't print all the information required to reconstruct / validate the error, specifically the irq-context state is missing. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a13f58a0ca
commit
9a019db0b6
|
@ -3952,10 +3952,36 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline short task_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set appropriate wait type for the context; for IRQs we have to take
|
||||
* into account force_irqthread as that is implied by PREEMPT_RT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (curr->hardirq_context) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if force_irqthreads will run us threaded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (curr->hardirq_threaded || curr->irq_config)
|
||||
return LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
|
||||
|
||||
return LD_WAIT_SPIN;
|
||||
} else if (curr->softirq_context) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Softirqs are always threaded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return LD_WAIT_MAX;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
print_lock_invalid_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr,
|
||||
struct held_lock *hlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
short curr_inner;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!debug_locks_off())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (debug_locks_silent)
|
||||
|
@ -3971,6 +3997,10 @@ print_lock_invalid_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr,
|
|||
print_lock(hlock);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_warn("other info that might help us debug this:\n");
|
||||
|
||||
curr_inner = task_wait_context(curr);
|
||||
pr_warn("context-{%d:%d}\n", curr_inner, curr_inner);
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_warn("stack backtrace:\n");
|
||||
|
@ -4017,26 +4047,7 @@ static int check_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
|
|||
}
|
||||
depth++;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set appropriate wait type for the context; for IRQs we have to take
|
||||
* into account force_irqthread as that is implied by PREEMPT_RT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (curr->hardirq_context) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if force_irqthreads will run us threaded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (curr->hardirq_threaded || curr->irq_config)
|
||||
curr_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
|
||||
else
|
||||
curr_inner = LD_WAIT_SPIN;
|
||||
} else if (curr->softirq_context) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Softirqs are always threaded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
curr_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
curr_inner = LD_WAIT_MAX;
|
||||
}
|
||||
curr_inner = task_wait_context(curr);
|
||||
|
||||
for (; depth < curr->lockdep_depth; depth++) {
|
||||
struct held_lock *prev = curr->held_locks + depth;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user