forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
IPv6: preferred lifetime of address not getting updated
There's a bug in addrconf_prefix_rcv() where it won't update the preferred lifetime of an IPv6 address if the current valid lifetime of the address is less than 2 hours (the minimum value in the RA). For example, If I send a router advertisement with a prefix that has valid lifetime = preferred lifetime = 2 hours we'll build this address: 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qlen 1000 inet6 2001:1890:1109:a20:217:8ff:fe7d:4718/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 7175sec preferred_lft 7175sec If I then send the same prefix with valid lifetime = preferred lifetime = 0 it will be ignored since the minimum valid lifetime is 2 hours: 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qlen 1000 inet6 2001:1890:1109:a20:217:8ff:fe7d:4718/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 7161sec preferred_lft 7161sec But according to RFC 4862 we should always reset the preferred lifetime even if the valid lifetime is invalid, which would cause the address to immediately get deprecated. So with this patch we'd see this: 5: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qlen 1000 inet6 2001:1890:1109:a20:21f:29ff:fe5a:ef04/64 scope global deprecated dynamic valid_lft 7163sec preferred_lft 0sec The comment winds-up being 5x the size of the code to fix the problem. Update the preferred lifetime of IPv6 addresses derived from a prefix info option in a router advertisement even if the valid lifetime in the option is invalid, as specified in RFC 4862 Section 5.5.3e. Fixes an issue where an address will not immediately become deprecated. Reported by Jens Rosenboom. Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59cae0092e
commit
a1ed05263b
|
@ -1916,8 +1916,32 @@ void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len)
|
|||
update_lft = 1;
|
||||
else if (stored_lft <= MIN_VALID_LIFETIME) {
|
||||
/* valid_lft <= stored_lft is always true */
|
||||
/* XXX: IPsec */
|
||||
update_lft = 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* RFC 4862 Section 5.5.3e:
|
||||
* "Note that the preferred lifetime of
|
||||
* the corresponding address is always
|
||||
* reset to the Preferred Lifetime in
|
||||
* the received Prefix Information
|
||||
* option, regardless of whether the
|
||||
* valid lifetime is also reset or
|
||||
* ignored."
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So if the preferred lifetime in
|
||||
* this advertisement is different
|
||||
* than what we have stored, but the
|
||||
* valid lifetime is invalid, just
|
||||
* reset prefered_lft.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We must set the valid lifetime
|
||||
* to the stored lifetime since we'll
|
||||
* be updating the timestamp below,
|
||||
* else we'll set it back to the
|
||||
* minumum.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prefered_lft != ifp->prefered_lft) {
|
||||
valid_lft = stored_lft;
|
||||
update_lft = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
valid_lft = MIN_VALID_LIFETIME;
|
||||
if (valid_lft < prefered_lft)
|
||||
|
@ -3085,7 +3109,7 @@ static void addrconf_verify(unsigned long foo)
|
|||
spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
} else if (age >= ifp->prefered_lft) {
|
||||
/* jiffies - ifp->tsamp > age >= ifp->prefered_lft */
|
||||
/* jiffies - ifp->tstamp > age >= ifp->prefered_lft */
|
||||
int deprecate = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(ifp->flags&IFA_F_DEPRECATED)) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user