forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Revert "gfs2: eliminate tr_num_revoke_rm"
This reverts commite955537e32
. Before patche955537e32
, tr_num_revoke tracked the number of revokes added to the transaction, and tr_num_revoke_rm tracked how many revokes were removed. But since revokes are queued off the sdp (superblock) pointer, some transactions could remove more revokes than they added. (e.g. revokes added by a different process). Commite955537e32
eliminated transaction variable tr_num_revoke_rm, but in order to do so, it changed the accounting to always use tr_num_revoke for its math. Since you can remove more revokes than you add, tr_num_revoke could now become a negative value. This negative value broke the assert in function gfs2_trans_end: if (gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, (nbuf <=3D tr->tr_blocks) && (tr->tr_num_revoke <=3D tr->tr_revokes))) One way to fix this is to simply remove the tr_num_revoke clause from the assert and allow the value to become negative. Andreas didn't like that idea, so instead, we decided to reverte955537e32
. Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c04f2e0dd5
commit
a31b4ec539
|
@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ struct gfs2_trans {
|
|||
unsigned int tr_num_buf_rm;
|
||||
unsigned int tr_num_databuf_rm;
|
||||
unsigned int tr_num_revoke;
|
||||
unsigned int tr_num_revoke_rm;
|
||||
|
||||
struct list_head tr_list;
|
||||
struct list_head tr_databuf;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ static void gfs2_merge_trans(struct gfs2_trans *old, struct gfs2_trans *new)
|
|||
old->tr_num_buf_rm += new->tr_num_buf_rm;
|
||||
old->tr_num_databuf_rm += new->tr_num_databuf_rm;
|
||||
old->tr_num_revoke += new->tr_num_revoke;
|
||||
old->tr_num_revoke_rm += new->tr_num_revoke_rm;
|
||||
|
||||
list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_databuf, &old->tr_databuf);
|
||||
list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_buf, &old->tr_buf);
|
||||
|
@ -916,7 +917,7 @@ static void log_refund(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
|
|||
set_bit(TR_ATTACHED, &tr->tr_flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sdp->sd_log_committed_revoke += tr->tr_num_revoke;
|
||||
sdp->sd_log_committed_revoke += tr->tr_num_revoke - tr->tr_num_revoke_rm;
|
||||
reserved = calc_reserved(sdp);
|
||||
maxres = sdp->sd_log_blks_reserved + tr->tr_reserved;
|
||||
gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, maxres >= reserved);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -76,10 +76,10 @@ static void gfs2_print_trans(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, const struct gfs2_trans *tr)
|
|||
fs_warn(sdp, "blocks=%u revokes=%u reserved=%u touched=%u\n",
|
||||
tr->tr_blocks, tr->tr_revokes, tr->tr_reserved,
|
||||
test_bit(TR_TOUCHED, &tr->tr_flags));
|
||||
fs_warn(sdp, "Buf %u/%u Databuf %u/%u Revoke %u\n",
|
||||
fs_warn(sdp, "Buf %u/%u Databuf %u/%u Revoke %u/%u\n",
|
||||
tr->tr_num_buf_new, tr->tr_num_buf_rm,
|
||||
tr->tr_num_databuf_new, tr->tr_num_databuf_rm,
|
||||
tr->tr_num_revoke);
|
||||
tr->tr_num_revoke, tr->tr_num_revoke_rm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void gfs2_trans_end(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
|
||||
|
@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ void gfs2_trans_remove_revoke(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 blkno, unsigned int len)
|
|||
if (bd->bd_gl)
|
||||
gfs2_glock_remove_revoke(bd->bd_gl);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(gfs2_bufdata_cachep, bd);
|
||||
tr->tr_num_revoke--;
|
||||
tr->tr_num_revoke_rm++;
|
||||
if (--n == 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user