forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
docs: RCU: Convert lockdep-splat.txt to ReST
- Add a SPDX header; - Add a document title; - Some whitespace fixes and new line breaks; - Mark literal blocks as such; - Add it to RCU/index.rst. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Paul E. McKenney
parent
6b05dfacd7
commit
a3b0a79f89
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ RCU concepts
|
|||
|
||||
arrayRCU
|
||||
checklist
|
||||
lockdep-splat
|
||||
rcubarrier
|
||||
rcu_dereference
|
||||
whatisRCU
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
|||
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
=================
|
||||
Lockdep-RCU Splat
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
Lockdep-RCU was added to the Linux kernel in early 2010
|
||||
(http://lwn.net/Articles/371986/). This facility checks for some common
|
||||
misuses of the RCU API, most notably using one of the rcu_dereference()
|
||||
|
|
@ -12,55 +18,54 @@ overwriting or worse. There can of course be false positives, this
|
|||
being the real world and all that.
|
||||
|
||||
So let's look at an example RCU lockdep splat from 3.0-rc5, one that
|
||||
has long since been fixed:
|
||||
has long since been fixed::
|
||||
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
block/cfq-iosched.c:2776 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
block/cfq-iosched.c:2776 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
|
||||
|
||||
other info that might help us debug this:
|
||||
other info that might help us debug this::
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
|
||||
3 locks held by scsi_scan_6/1552:
|
||||
#0: (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8145efca>]
|
||||
scsi_scan_host_selected+0x5a/0x150
|
||||
#1: (&eq->sysfs_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812a5032>]
|
||||
elevator_exit+0x22/0x60
|
||||
#2: (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff812b6233>]
|
||||
cfq_exit_queue+0x43/0x190
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
|
||||
3 locks held by scsi_scan_6/1552:
|
||||
#0: (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8145efca>]
|
||||
scsi_scan_host_selected+0x5a/0x150
|
||||
#1: (&eq->sysfs_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812a5032>]
|
||||
elevator_exit+0x22/0x60
|
||||
#2: (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff812b6233>]
|
||||
cfq_exit_queue+0x43/0x190
|
||||
stack backtrace:
|
||||
Pid: 1552, comm: scsi_scan_6 Not tainted 3.0.0-rc5 #17
|
||||
Call Trace:
|
||||
[<ffffffff810abb9b>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xbb/0xc0
|
||||
[<ffffffff812b6139>] __cfq_exit_single_io_context+0xe9/0x120
|
||||
[<ffffffff812b626c>] cfq_exit_queue+0x7c/0x190
|
||||
[<ffffffff812a5046>] elevator_exit+0x36/0x60
|
||||
[<ffffffff812a802a>] blk_cleanup_queue+0x4a/0x60
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145cc09>] scsi_free_queue+0x9/0x10
|
||||
[<ffffffff81460944>] __scsi_remove_device+0x84/0xd0
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145dca3>] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x353/0xb10
|
||||
[<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff817d98ed>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3d/0x80
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145e722>] __scsi_scan_target+0x112/0x680
|
||||
[<ffffffff812c690d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
|
||||
[<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff812bcc60>] ? kobject_del+0x40/0x40
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145ed16>] scsi_scan_channel+0x86/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f0b0>] scsi_scan_host_selected+0x140/0x150
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f149>] do_scsi_scan_host+0x89/0x90
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f170>] do_scan_async+0x20/0x160
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f150>] ? do_scsi_scan_host+0x90/0x90
|
||||
[<ffffffff810975b6>] kthread+0xa6/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff817db154>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
|
||||
[<ffffffff81066430>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0x110
|
||||
[<ffffffff817d9c04>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
|
||||
[<ffffffff81097510>] ? __kthread_init_worker+0x70/0x70
|
||||
[<ffffffff817db150>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
|
||||
|
||||
stack backtrace:
|
||||
Pid: 1552, comm: scsi_scan_6 Not tainted 3.0.0-rc5 #17
|
||||
Call Trace:
|
||||
[<ffffffff810abb9b>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xbb/0xc0
|
||||
[<ffffffff812b6139>] __cfq_exit_single_io_context+0xe9/0x120
|
||||
[<ffffffff812b626c>] cfq_exit_queue+0x7c/0x190
|
||||
[<ffffffff812a5046>] elevator_exit+0x36/0x60
|
||||
[<ffffffff812a802a>] blk_cleanup_queue+0x4a/0x60
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145cc09>] scsi_free_queue+0x9/0x10
|
||||
[<ffffffff81460944>] __scsi_remove_device+0x84/0xd0
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145dca3>] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x353/0xb10
|
||||
[<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff817d98ed>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3d/0x80
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145e722>] __scsi_scan_target+0x112/0x680
|
||||
[<ffffffff812c690d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
|
||||
[<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff812bcc60>] ? kobject_del+0x40/0x40
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145ed16>] scsi_scan_channel+0x86/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f0b0>] scsi_scan_host_selected+0x140/0x150
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f149>] do_scsi_scan_host+0x89/0x90
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f170>] do_scan_async+0x20/0x160
|
||||
[<ffffffff8145f150>] ? do_scsi_scan_host+0x90/0x90
|
||||
[<ffffffff810975b6>] kthread+0xa6/0xb0
|
||||
[<ffffffff817db154>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
|
||||
[<ffffffff81066430>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0x110
|
||||
[<ffffffff817d9c04>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
|
||||
[<ffffffff81097510>] ? __kthread_init_worker+0x70/0x70
|
||||
[<ffffffff817db150>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
|
||||
|
||||
Line 2776 of block/cfq-iosched.c in v3.0-rc5 is as follows:
|
||||
Line 2776 of block/cfq-iosched.c in v3.0-rc5 is as follows::
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) == cic) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ case. Instead, we hold three locks, one of which might be RCU related.
|
|||
And maybe that lock really does protect this reference. If so, the fix
|
||||
is to inform RCU, perhaps by changing __cfq_exit_single_io_context() to
|
||||
take the struct request_queue "q" from cfq_exit_queue() as an argument,
|
||||
which would permit us to invoke rcu_dereference_protected as follows:
|
||||
which would permit us to invoke rcu_dereference_protected as follows::
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_dereference_protected(ioc->ioc_data,
|
||||
lockdep_is_held(&q->queue_lock)) == cic) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,7 +90,7 @@ On the other hand, perhaps we really do need an RCU read-side critical
|
|||
section. In this case, the critical section must span the use of the
|
||||
return value from rcu_dereference(), or at least until there is some
|
||||
reference count incremented or some such. One way to handle this is to
|
||||
add rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() as follows:
|
||||
add rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() as follows::
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) == cic) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -102,7 +107,7 @@ above lockdep-RCU splat.
|
|||
But in this particular case, we don't actually dereference the pointer
|
||||
returned from rcu_dereference(). Instead, that pointer is just compared
|
||||
to the cic pointer, which means that the rcu_dereference() can be replaced
|
||||
by rcu_access_pointer() as follows:
|
||||
by rcu_access_pointer() as follows::
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_access_pointer(ioc->ioc_data) == cic) {
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user