forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
PCI: pciehp: Handle surprise add even if surprise removal isn't supported
The PCIe spec (r3.0, sec 7.8.9) says Hot-Plug Surprise indicates support for surprise *removal*, but pciehp checked this to determine if it should handle presence detect interrupts for device *addition*. Allow surprise device addition even if the slot doesn't advertise support for surprise removal. Keith has a platform with slots for front-loading SFF devices. The slots do not have attention buttons and do not support surprise removal, but they do have presence detect. In that case, we still want to use presence detect for device addition. Keith's original patch handled surprise insertions only if Hot-Plug Capable is set. I think that test is superfluous because pciehp only claims slots that advertise Hot-Plug Capable (see get_port_device_capability()). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1419275223-14602-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com Based-on-patch-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17f14b51f2
commit
a93b506e26
@ -532,8 +532,6 @@ static void interrupt_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
pciehp_green_led_off(p_slot);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case INT_PRESENCE_ON:
|
||||
if (!HP_SUPR_RM(ctrl))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Surprise Insertion\n");
|
||||
handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user