forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[MIPS] Probe for usability of cp0 compare interrupt.
Some processors offer the option of using the interrupt on which normally the count / compare interrupt would be signaled as a normal interupt pin. Previously this required some ugly hackery for each system which is much easier done by a quick and simple probe. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
60b0d65541
commit
b0d4056dd6
|
@ -391,6 +391,50 @@ static void mips_event_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev)
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* FIXME: This doesn't hold for the relocated E9000 compare interrupt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int c0_compare_int_pending(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (read_c0_cause() >> cp0_compare_irq) & 0x100;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int c0_compare_int_usable(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const unsigned int delta = 0x300000;
|
||||
unsigned int cnt;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* IP7 already pending? Try to clear it by acking the timer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (c0_compare_int_pending()) {
|
||||
write_c0_compare(read_c0_compare());
|
||||
irq_disable_hazard();
|
||||
if (c0_compare_int_pending())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cnt = read_c0_count();
|
||||
cnt += delta;
|
||||
write_c0_compare(cnt);
|
||||
|
||||
while ((long)(read_c0_count() - cnt) <= 0)
|
||||
; /* Wait for expiry */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!c0_compare_int_pending())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
write_c0_compare(read_c0_compare());
|
||||
irq_disable_hazard();
|
||||
if (c0_compare_int_pending())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Feels like a real count / compare timer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void __cpuinit mips_clockevent_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint64_t mips_freq = mips_hpt_frequency;
|
||||
|
@ -412,6 +456,9 @@ void __cpuinit mips_clockevent_init(void)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (!c0_compare_int_usable())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
cd = &per_cpu(mips_clockevent_device, cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
cd->name = "MIPS";
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user