forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
irqchip/mips-gic: Make local symbols static
The sparse tool complains as follows: drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c:49:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_pcpu_masks' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c:620:6: warning: symbol 'gic_ipi_domain_free' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c:634:5: warning: symbol 'gic_ipi_domain_match' was not declared. Should it be static? Those symbols are not used outside of irq-mips-gic.c, so marks them static. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200714142245.16124-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
45e9504f10
commit
b0e453ffdd
|
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
void __iomem *mips_gic_base;
|
||||
|
||||
DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long[GIC_MAX_LONGS], pcpu_masks);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long[GIC_MAX_LONGS], pcpu_masks);
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gic_lock);
|
||||
static struct irq_domain *gic_irq_domain;
|
||||
|
@ -617,8 +617,8 @@ static int gic_ipi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void gic_ipi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
|
||||
unsigned int nr_irqs)
|
||||
static void gic_ipi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
|
||||
unsigned int nr_irqs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
irq_hw_number_t base_hwirq;
|
||||
struct irq_data *data;
|
||||
|
@ -631,8 +631,8 @@ void gic_ipi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
|
|||
bitmap_set(ipi_available, base_hwirq, nr_irqs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int gic_ipi_domain_match(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *node,
|
||||
enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
|
||||
static int gic_ipi_domain_match(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *node,
|
||||
enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool is_ipi;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user