AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.

Browse Source 
The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
This commit is contained in:
David S. Miller 2011-12-14 10:05:22 -08:00
parent dbf2b92d54
commit b1f44e13a5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c
View File

@ -302,8 +302,7 @@ void __init btfixup(void)
case 'i': /* INT */
if ((insn & 0xc1c00000) == 0x01000000) /* %HI */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffc00000) | (p[1] >> 10));
else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000 &&
(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000) /* %LO */
else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000) /* %LO */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffffe000) | (p[1] & 0x3ff));
else {
prom_printf(insn_i, p, addr, insn);