forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
tee: optee: avoid possible double list_del()
This bug occurs when: - a new request arrives, one thread(let's call it A) is pending in optee_supp_req() with req->busy is initial value false. - tee-supplicant is killed, then optee_supp_release() is called, this function calls list_del(&req->link), and set supp->ctx to NULL. And it also wake up process A. - process A continues, it firstly checks supp->ctx which is NULL, then checks req->busy which is false, at last run list_del(&req->link). This triggers double list_del() and results kernel panic. For solve this problem, we rename req->busy to req->in_queue, and associate it with state of whether req is linked to supp->reqs. So we can just only check req->in_queue to make decision calling list_del() or not. Signed-off-by: Zhizhou Zhang <zhizhouzhang@asrmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
40e020c129
commit
b2d102bd01
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
|
|||
struct optee_supp_req {
|
||||
struct list_head link;
|
||||
|
||||
bool busy;
|
||||
bool in_queue;
|
||||
u32 func;
|
||||
u32 ret;
|
||||
size_t num_params;
|
||||
|
@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ void optee_supp_release(struct optee_supp *supp)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Abort all request retrieved by supplicant */
|
||||
idr_for_each_entry(&supp->idr, req, id) {
|
||||
req->busy = false;
|
||||
idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
|
||||
req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
|
||||
complete(&req->c);
|
||||
|
@ -63,6 +62,7 @@ void optee_supp_release(struct optee_supp *supp)
|
|||
/* Abort all queued requests */
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, req_tmp, &supp->reqs, link) {
|
||||
list_del(&req->link);
|
||||
req->in_queue = false;
|
||||
req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
|
||||
complete(&req->c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
|
|||
/* Insert the request in the request list */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&req->link, &supp->reqs);
|
||||
req->in_queue = true;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Tell an eventual waiter there's a new request */
|
||||
|
@ -130,9 +131,10 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
|
|||
* will serve all requests in a timely manner and
|
||||
* interrupting then wouldn't make sense.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
interruptable = !req->busy;
|
||||
if (!req->busy)
|
||||
if (req->in_queue) {
|
||||
list_del(&req->link);
|
||||
req->in_queue = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp,
|
|||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
|
||||
list_del(&req->link);
|
||||
req->busy = true;
|
||||
req->in_queue = false;
|
||||
|
||||
return req;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -318,7 +320,6 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_req(struct optee_supp *supp,
|
|||
if ((num_params - nm) != req->num_params)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
|
||||
req->busy = false;
|
||||
idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
|
||||
supp->req_id = -1;
|
||||
*num_meta = nm;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user