forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ocfs2: fix readonly issue in ocfs2_unlink()
While deleting a file with ocfs2_unlink(), there is a bug in this function. This bug will result in filesystem read-only. After calling ocfs2_orphan_add(), the file which will be deleted is added into orphan dir. If ocfs2_delete_entry() fails, the file still exists in the parent dir. And this scenario introduces a conflict of metadata. If a file is added into orphan dir, when we put inode of the file with iput(), the inode i_flags is setted (~OCFS2_VALID_FL) in ocfs2_remove_inode(), and then write back to disk. But as previously mentioned, the file still exists in the parent dir. On other nodes, the file can be still accessed. When first read the file with ocfs2_read_blocks() from disk, It will check and avalidate inode using ocfs2_validate_inode_block(). So File system will be readonly because the inode is invalid. In other words, the inode i_flags has been set (~OCFS2_VALID_FL). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanups] [jeff.liu@oracle.com: s/inode_is_unlinkable/ocfs2_inode_is_unlinkable/] Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jensen <shencanquan@huawei.com> Cc: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
25e2892101
commit
b5a8bb717e
|
@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static int ocfs2_remote_dentry_delete(struct dentry *dentry)
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int inode_is_unlinkable(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
static inline int ocfs2_inode_is_unlinkable(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
|
||||
if (inode->i_nlink == 2)
|
||||
|
@ -791,6 +791,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
|
|||
{
|
||||
int status;
|
||||
int child_locked = 0;
|
||||
bool is_unlinkable = false;
|
||||
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
|
||||
struct inode *orphan_dir = NULL;
|
||||
struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
|
||||
|
@ -865,7 +866,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
|
|||
goto leave;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
|
||||
if (ocfs2_inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
|
||||
status = ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir(osb, &orphan_dir,
|
||||
OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
|
||||
orphan_name, &orphan_insert);
|
||||
|
@ -873,6 +874,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
|
|||
mlog_errno(status);
|
||||
goto leave;
|
||||
}
|
||||
is_unlinkable = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, ocfs2_unlink_credits(osb->sb));
|
||||
|
@ -892,15 +894,6 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
|
|||
|
||||
fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) fe_bh->b_data;
|
||||
|
||||
if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
|
||||
status = ocfs2_orphan_add(osb, handle, inode, fe_bh, orphan_name,
|
||||
&orphan_insert, orphan_dir);
|
||||
if (status < 0) {
|
||||
mlog_errno(status);
|
||||
goto leave;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* delete the name from the parent dir */
|
||||
status = ocfs2_delete_entry(handle, dir, &lookup);
|
||||
if (status < 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -923,6 +916,14 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
|
|||
mlog_errno(status);
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
|
||||
inc_nlink(dir);
|
||||
goto leave;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_unlinkable) {
|
||||
status = ocfs2_orphan_add(osb, handle, inode, fe_bh,
|
||||
orphan_name, &orphan_insert, orphan_dir);
|
||||
if (status < 0)
|
||||
mlog_errno(status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
leave:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user