forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
rcu: Give different levels of the rcu_node hierarchy distinct lockdep names
Previously, each level of the rcu_node hierarchy had the same rather unimaginative name: "&rcu_node_class[i]". This makes lockdep diagnostics involving these lockdep classes less helpful than would be nice. This patch fixes this by giving each level of the rcu_node hierarchy a distinct name: "rcu_node_level_0", "rcu_node_level_1", and so on. This version of the patch includes improved diagnostics suggested by Josh Triplett and Peter Zijlstra. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12626498421830-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cba8244a0f
commit
b6407e8639
@ -1811,11 +1811,17 @@ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static char *buf[] = { "rcu_node_level_0",
|
||||
"rcu_node_level_1",
|
||||
"rcu_node_level_2",
|
||||
"rcu_node_level_3" }; /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
|
||||
int cpustride = 1;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int j;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp;
|
||||
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RCU_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); /* Fix buf[] init! */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < NUM_RCU_LVLS; i++)
|
||||
@ -1829,7 +1835,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
rnp = rsp->level[i];
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
lockdep_set_class(&rnp->lock, &rcu_node_class[i]);
|
||||
lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->lock,
|
||||
&rcu_node_class[i], buf[i]);
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = 0;
|
||||
rnp->qsmask = 0;
|
||||
rnp->qsmaskinit = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user