forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
stm class: Fix a module refcount leak in policy creation error path
Commitc7fd62bc69
("stm class: Introduce framing protocol drivers") adds a bug into the error path of policy creation, that would do a module_put() on a wrong module, if one tried to create a policy for an stm device which already has a policy, using a different protocol. IOW, | mkdir /config/stp-policy/dummy_stm.0:p_basic.test | mkdir /config/stp-policy/dummy_stm.0:p_sys-t.test # puts "p_basic" | mkdir /config/stp-policy/dummy_stm.0:p_sys-t.test # "p_basic" -> -1 throws: | general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI | CPU: 3 PID: 2887 Comm: mkdir | RIP: 0010:module_put.part.31+0xe/0x90 | Call Trace: | module_put+0x13/0x20 | stm_put_protocol+0x11/0x20 [stm_core] | stp_policy_make+0xf1/0x210 [stm_core] | ? __kmalloc+0x183/0x220 | ? configfs_mkdir+0x10d/0x4c0 | configfs_mkdir+0x169/0x4c0 | vfs_mkdir+0x108/0x1c0 | do_mkdirat+0xe8/0x110 | __x64_sys_mkdir+0x1b/0x20 | do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x140 | entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Correct this sad mistake by calling calling 'put' on the correct reference, which happens to match another error path in the same function, so we consolidate the two at the same time. Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Fixes:c7fd62bc69
("stm class: Introduce framing protocol drivers") Reported-by: Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@intel.com> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fdfaef2126
commit
c18614a1a1
|
@ -440,10 +440,8 @@ stp_policy_make(struct config_group *group, const char *name)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
stm->policy = kzalloc(sizeof(*stm->policy), GFP_KERNEL);
|
stm->policy = kzalloc(sizeof(*stm->policy), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||||
if (!stm->policy) {
|
if (!stm->policy) {
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&stm->policy_mutex);
|
ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||||
stm_put_protocol(pdrv);
|
goto unlock_policy;
|
||||||
stm_put_device(stm);
|
|
||||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
config_group_init_type_name(&stm->policy->group, name,
|
config_group_init_type_name(&stm->policy->group, name,
|
||||||
|
@ -458,7 +456,11 @@ stp_policy_make(struct config_group *group, const char *name)
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&stm->policy_mutex);
|
mutex_unlock(&stm->policy_mutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (IS_ERR(ret)) {
|
if (IS_ERR(ret)) {
|
||||||
stm_put_protocol(stm->pdrv);
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* pdrv and stm->pdrv at this point can be quite different,
|
||||||
|
* and only one of them needs to be 'put'
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
stm_put_protocol(pdrv);
|
||||||
stm_put_device(stm);
|
stm_put_device(stm);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user