forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
xen-evtchn: Bind dyn evtchn:qemu-dm interrupt to next online VCPU
A HVM domian booting generates around 200K (evtchn:qemu-dm xen-dyn) interrupts,in a short period of time. All these evtchn:qemu-dm are bound to VCPU 0, until irqbalance sees these IRQ and moves it to a different VCPU. In one configuration, irqbalance runs every 10 seconds, which means irqbalance doesn't get to see these burst of interrupts and doesn't re-balance interrupts most of the time, making all evtchn:qemu-dm to be processed by VCPU0. This cause VCPU0 to spend most of time processing hardirq and very little time on softirq. Moreover, if dom0 kernel PREEMPTION is disabled, VCPU0 never runs watchdog (process context), triggering a softlockup detection code to panic. Binding evtchn:qemu-dm to next online VCPU, will spread hardirq processing evenly across different CPU. Later, irqbalance will try to balance evtchn:qemu-dm, if required. Signed-off-by: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cc91f2121
commit
c48f64ab47
|
@ -1303,10 +1303,9 @@ void rebind_evtchn_irq(int evtchn, int irq)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Rebind an evtchn so that it gets delivered to a specific cpu */
|
||||
static int rebind_irq_to_cpu(unsigned irq, unsigned tcpu)
|
||||
int xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu(int evtchn, unsigned tcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct evtchn_bind_vcpu bind_vcpu;
|
||||
int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
|
||||
int masked;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn))
|
||||
|
@ -1338,13 +1337,14 @@ static int rebind_irq_to_cpu(unsigned irq, unsigned tcpu)
|
|||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
static int set_affinity_irq(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *dest,
|
||||
bool force)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned tcpu = cpumask_first_and(dest, cpu_online_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
return rebind_irq_to_cpu(data->irq, tcpu);
|
||||
return xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu(evtchn_from_irq(data->irq), tcpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void enable_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -421,6 +421,36 @@ static void evtchn_unbind_from_user(struct per_user_data *u,
|
|||
del_evtchn(u, evtchn);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bind_last_selected_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
static void evtchn_bind_interdom_next_vcpu(int evtchn)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int selected_cpu, irq;
|
||||
struct irq_desc *desc;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
irq = irq_from_evtchn(evtchn);
|
||||
desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!desc)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
selected_cpu = this_cpu_read(bind_last_selected_cpu);
|
||||
selected_cpu = cpumask_next_and(selected_cpu,
|
||||
desc->irq_common_data.affinity, cpu_online_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(selected_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
|
||||
selected_cpu = cpumask_first_and(desc->irq_common_data.affinity,
|
||||
cpu_online_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
this_cpu_write(bind_last_selected_cpu, selected_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/* unmask expects irqs to be disabled */
|
||||
xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu(evtchn, selected_cpu);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static long evtchn_ioctl(struct file *file,
|
||||
unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -478,8 +508,10 @@ static long evtchn_ioctl(struct file *file,
|
|||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = evtchn_bind_to_user(u, bind_interdomain.local_port);
|
||||
if (rc == 0)
|
||||
if (rc == 0) {
|
||||
rc = bind_interdomain.local_port;
|
||||
evtchn_bind_interdom_next_vcpu(rc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ void evtchn_put(unsigned int evtchn);
|
|||
|
||||
void xen_send_IPI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum ipi_vector vector);
|
||||
void rebind_evtchn_irq(int evtchn, int irq);
|
||||
int xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu(int evtchn, unsigned tcpu);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void notify_remote_via_evtchn(int port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user