forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
cfq-iosched: account for slice over/under time
If a slice uses less than it is entitled to (or perhaps more), include that in the decision on how much time to give it the next time it gets serviced. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
44f7c16065
commit
c5b680f3b7
@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ struct cfq_queue {
|
||||
struct list_head fifo;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned long slice_end;
|
||||
unsigned long slice_left;
|
||||
unsigned long service_last;
|
||||
long slice_resid;
|
||||
|
||||
/* number of requests that are on the dispatch list */
|
||||
int on_dispatch[2];
|
||||
@ -251,6 +251,14 @@ static inline void
|
||||
cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
|
||||
cfqq->slice_end += cfqq->slice_resid;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't carry over residual for more than one slice, we only want
|
||||
* to slightly correct the fairness. Carrying over forever would
|
||||
* easily introduce oscillations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cfqq->slice_resid = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -667,7 +675,6 @@ __cfq_set_active_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
|
||||
del_timer(&cfqd->idle_class_timer);
|
||||
|
||||
cfqq->slice_end = 0;
|
||||
cfqq->slice_left = 0;
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_must_alloc_slice(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_fifo_expire(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_slice_new(cfqq);
|
||||
@ -683,8 +690,6 @@ static void
|
||||
__cfq_slice_expired(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
|
||||
int preempted)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long now = jiffies;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfq_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq))
|
||||
del_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -699,10 +704,8 @@ __cfq_slice_expired(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
|
||||
* store what was left of this slice, if the queue idled out
|
||||
* or was preempted
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq))
|
||||
cfqq->slice_left = cfqq->slice_end - now;
|
||||
else
|
||||
cfqq->slice_left = 0;
|
||||
if (!cfq_cfqq_slice_new(cfqq))
|
||||
cfqq->slice_resid = cfqq->slice_end - jiffies;
|
||||
|
||||
cfq_resort_rr_list(cfqq, preempted);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1364,10 +1367,7 @@ cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, unsigned int key, struct task_struct *tsk,
|
||||
hlist_add_head(&cfqq->cfq_hash, &cfqd->cfq_hash[hashval]);
|
||||
atomic_set(&cfqq->ref, 0);
|
||||
cfqq->cfqd = cfqd;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* set ->slice_left to allow preemption for a new process
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cfqq->slice_left = 2 * cfqd->cfq_slice_idle;
|
||||
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_prio_changed(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_queue_new(cfqq);
|
||||
@ -1585,11 +1585,6 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if (!cfq_cfqq_wait_request(new_cfqq))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* if it doesn't have slice left, forget it
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (new_cfqq->slice_left < cfqd->cfq_slice_idle)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* if the new request is sync, but the currently running queue is
|
||||
* not, let the sync request have priority.
|
||||
@ -1614,9 +1609,6 @@ static void cfq_preempt_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cfq_slice_expired(cfqd, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cfqq->slice_left)
|
||||
cfqq->slice_left = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Put the new queue at the front of the of the current list,
|
||||
* so we know that it will be selected next.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user