forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[PATCH] irq: uninline migration functions
Uninline some massive IRQ migration functions. Put them in the new kernel/irq/migration.c. Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4cae59d2e8
commit
c777ac5594
|
@ -114,53 +114,8 @@ static inline void set_native_irq_info(int irq, cpumask_t mask)
|
|||
#if defined (CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ) || defined (CONFIG_IRQBALANCE)
|
||||
extern cpumask_t pending_irq_cpumask[NR_IRQS];
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void set_pending_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + irq;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
desc->move_irq = 1;
|
||||
pending_irq_cpumask[irq] = mask;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
move_native_irq(int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cpumask_t tmp;
|
||||
irq_desc_t *desc = irq_descp(irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely (!desc->move_irq))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
desc->move_irq = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(cpus_empty(pending_irq_cpumask[irq])))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!desc->handler->set_affinity)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* note - we hold the desc->lock */
|
||||
cpus_and(tmp, pending_irq_cpumask[irq], cpu_online_map);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there was a valid mask to work with, please
|
||||
* do the disable, re-program, enable sequence.
|
||||
* This is *not* particularly important for level triggered
|
||||
* but in a edge trigger case, we might be setting rte
|
||||
* when an active trigger is comming in. This could
|
||||
* cause some ioapics to mal-function.
|
||||
* Being paranoid i guess!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!cpus_empty(tmp))) {
|
||||
desc->handler->disable(irq);
|
||||
desc->handler->set_affinity(irq,tmp);
|
||||
desc->handler->enable(irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
cpus_clear(pending_irq_cpumask[irq]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
void set_pending_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask);
|
||||
void move_native_irq(int irq);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
|
|||
|
||||
obj-y := handle.o manage.o spurious.o
|
||||
obj-y := handle.o manage.o spurious.o migration.o
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE) += autoprobe.o
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
52
kernel/irq/migration.c
Normal file
52
kernel/irq/migration.c
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
#include <linux/irq.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ)
|
||||
|
||||
void set_pending_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + irq;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
desc->move_irq = 1;
|
||||
pending_irq_cpumask[irq] = mask;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void move_native_irq(int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cpumask_t tmp;
|
||||
irq_desc_t *desc = irq_descp(irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely (!desc->move_irq))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
desc->move_irq = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(cpus_empty(pending_irq_cpumask[irq])))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!desc->handler->set_affinity)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* note - we hold the desc->lock */
|
||||
cpus_and(tmp, pending_irq_cpumask[irq], cpu_online_map);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there was a valid mask to work with, please
|
||||
* do the disable, re-program, enable sequence.
|
||||
* This is *not* particularly important for level triggered
|
||||
* but in a edge trigger case, we might be setting rte
|
||||
* when an active trigger is comming in. This could
|
||||
* cause some ioapics to mal-function.
|
||||
* Being paranoid i guess!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!cpus_empty(tmp))) {
|
||||
desc->handler->disable(irq);
|
||||
desc->handler->set_affinity(irq,tmp);
|
||||
desc->handler->enable(irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
cpus_clear(pending_irq_cpumask[irq]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user