forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Simplify and comment on anon_vma re-use for anon_vma_prepare()
This changes the anon_vma reuse case to require that we only reuse simple anon_vma's - ie the case when the vma only has a single anon_vma associated with it. This means that a reuse of an anon_vma from an adjacent vma will always guarantee that both vma's are associated not only with the same anon_vma, they will also have the same anon_vma chain (of just a single entry in this case). And since anon_vma re-use was the only case where the same anon_vma might be associated with different chains of anon_vma's, we now have the case that every vma that shares the same anon_vma will always also have the same chain. That makes it much easier to think about merging vma's that share the same anon_vma's: you can always just drop the other anon_vma chain in anon_vma_merge() since you know that they are always identical. This also splits up the function to validate the anon_vma re-use, and adds a lot of commentary about the possible races. Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> [ "That didn't fix it" ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0eddb519b9
commit
d0e9fe1758
86
mm/mmap.c
86
mm/mmap.c
@ -824,6 +824,61 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Rough compatbility check to quickly see if it's even worth looking
|
||||
* at sharing an anon_vma.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* They need to have the same vm_file, and the flags can only differ
|
||||
* in things that mprotect may change.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTE! The fact that we share an anon_vma doesn't _have_ to mean that
|
||||
* we can merge the two vma's. For example, we refuse to merge a vma if
|
||||
* there is a vm_ops->close() function, because that indicates that the
|
||||
* driver is doing some kind of reference counting. But that doesn't
|
||||
* really matter for the anon_vma sharing case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int anon_vma_compatible(struct vm_area_struct *a, struct vm_area_struct *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return a->vm_end == b->vm_start &&
|
||||
mpol_equal(vma_policy(a), vma_policy(b)) &&
|
||||
a->vm_file == b->vm_file &&
|
||||
!((a->vm_flags ^ b->vm_flags) & ~(VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC)) &&
|
||||
b->vm_pgoff == a->vm_pgoff + ((b->vm_start - a->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Do some basic sanity checking to see if we can re-use the anon_vma
|
||||
* from 'old'. The 'a'/'b' vma's are in VM order - one of them will be
|
||||
* the same as 'old', the other will be the new one that is trying
|
||||
* to share the anon_vma.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTE! This runs with mm_sem held for reading, so it is possible that
|
||||
* the anon_vma of 'old' is concurrently in the process of being set up
|
||||
* by another page fault trying to merge _that_. But that's ok: if it
|
||||
* is being set up, that automatically means that it will be a singleton
|
||||
* acceptable for merging, so we can do all of this optimistically. But
|
||||
* we do that ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure that we never re-load the pointer.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IOW: that the "list_is_singular()" test on the anon_vma_chain only
|
||||
* matters for the 'stable anon_vma' case (ie the thing we want to avoid
|
||||
* is to return an anon_vma that is "complex" due to having gone through
|
||||
* a fork).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We also make sure that the two vma's are compatible (adjacent,
|
||||
* and with the same memory policies). That's all stable, even with just
|
||||
* a read lock on the mm_sem.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct anon_vma *reusable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *old, struct vm_area_struct *a, struct vm_area_struct *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (anon_vma_compatible(a, b)) {
|
||||
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = ACCESS_ONCE(old->anon_vma);
|
||||
|
||||
if (anon_vma && list_is_singular(&old->anon_vma_chain))
|
||||
return anon_vma;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* find_mergeable_anon_vma is used by anon_vma_prepare, to check
|
||||
* neighbouring vmas for a suitable anon_vma, before it goes off
|
||||
@ -834,28 +889,16 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct anon_vma *find_mergeable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *near;
|
||||
unsigned long vm_flags;
|
||||
|
||||
near = vma->vm_next;
|
||||
if (!near)
|
||||
goto try_prev;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since only mprotect tries to remerge vmas, match flags
|
||||
* which might be mprotected into each other later on.
|
||||
* Neither mlock nor madvise tries to remerge at present,
|
||||
* so leave their flags as obstructing a merge.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
vm_flags = vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC);
|
||||
vm_flags |= near->vm_flags & (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC);
|
||||
|
||||
if (near->anon_vma && vma->vm_end == near->vm_start &&
|
||||
mpol_equal(vma_policy(vma), vma_policy(near)) &&
|
||||
can_vma_merge_before(near, vm_flags,
|
||||
NULL, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff +
|
||||
((vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
|
||||
return near->anon_vma;
|
||||
anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(near, vma, near);
|
||||
if (anon_vma)
|
||||
return anon_vma;
|
||||
try_prev:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It is potentially slow to have to call find_vma_prev here.
|
||||
@ -868,14 +911,9 @@ struct anon_vma *find_mergeable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
if (!near)
|
||||
goto none;
|
||||
|
||||
vm_flags = vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC);
|
||||
vm_flags |= near->vm_flags & (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC);
|
||||
|
||||
if (near->anon_vma && near->vm_end == vma->vm_start &&
|
||||
mpol_equal(vma_policy(near), vma_policy(vma)) &&
|
||||
can_vma_merge_after(near, vm_flags,
|
||||
NULL, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff))
|
||||
return near->anon_vma;
|
||||
anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(near, near, vma);
|
||||
if (anon_vma)
|
||||
return anon_vma;
|
||||
none:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There's no absolute need to look only at touching neighbours:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user