From d303de1fcf344ff7c15ed64c3f48a991c9958775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Mladek Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:21:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Initialize iter->seq after zeroing in tracing_read_pipe() A customer reported the following softlockup: [899688.160002] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [test.sh:16464] [899688.160002] CPU: 0 PID: 16464 Comm: test.sh Not tainted 4.12.14-6.23-azure #1 SLE12-SP4 [899688.160002] RIP: 0010:up_write+0x1a/0x30 [899688.160002] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks [899688.160002] RIP: 0010:up_write+0x1a/0x30 [899688.160002] RSP: 0018:ffffa86784d4fde8 EFLAGS: 00000257 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff12 [899688.160002] RAX: ffffffff970fea00 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [899688.160002] RDX: ffffffff00000001 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: ffffffff970fea00 [899688.160002] RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000 [899688.160002] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8b59014720d8 [899688.160002] R13: ffff8b59014720c0 R14: ffff8b5901471090 R15: ffff8b5901470000 [899688.160002] tracing_read_pipe+0x336/0x3c0 [899688.160002] __vfs_read+0x26/0x140 [899688.160002] vfs_read+0x87/0x130 [899688.160002] SyS_read+0x42/0x90 [899688.160002] do_syscall_64+0x74/0x160 It caught the process in the middle of trace_access_unlock(). There is no loop. So, it must be looping in the caller tracing_read_pipe() via the "waitagain" label. Crashdump analyze uncovered that iter->seq was completely zeroed at this point, including iter->seq.seq.size. It means that print_trace_line() was never able to print anything and there was no forward progress. The culprit seems to be in the code: /* reset all but tr, trace, and overruns */ memset(&iter->seq, 0, sizeof(struct trace_iterator) - offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq)); It was added by the commit 53d0aa773053ab182877 ("ftrace: add logic to record overruns"). It was v2.6.27-rc1. It was the time when iter->seq looked like: struct trace_seq { unsigned char buffer[PAGE_SIZE]; unsigned int len; }; There was no "size" variable and zeroing was perfectly fine. The solution is to reinitialize the structure after or without zeroing. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191011142134.11997-1-pmladek@suse.com Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 2b4eff383505..6a0ee9178365 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -6036,6 +6036,7 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, sizeof(struct trace_iterator) - offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq)); cpumask_clear(iter->started); + trace_seq_init(&iter->seq); iter->pos = -1; trace_event_read_lock();