forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
firewire: ohci: Misleading kfree in ohci.c::pci_probe/remove
It seems drivers/firewire/ohci.c is making some optimistic assumptions about struct fw_ohci and that member "card" will always remain the first member of the struct. Plus it's probably going to confuse a lot of static code analyzers too. So I wonder if there is a good reason not to free the ohci struct just like it was allocated instead of the tricky &ohci->card way? Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> It is perhaps just a rudiment from before mainline submission of the driver. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6258fc1fe
commit
d838d2c09a
@ -3309,7 +3309,7 @@ static int __devinit pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
|
||||
fail_disable:
|
||||
pci_disable_device(dev);
|
||||
fail_free:
|
||||
kfree(&ohci->card);
|
||||
kfree(ohci);
|
||||
pmac_ohci_off(dev);
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
if (err == -ENOMEM)
|
||||
@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ static void pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
pci_iounmap(dev, ohci->registers);
|
||||
pci_release_region(dev, 0);
|
||||
pci_disable_device(dev);
|
||||
kfree(&ohci->card);
|
||||
kfree(ohci);
|
||||
pmac_ohci_off(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
fw_notify("Removed fw-ohci device.\n");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user