forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues
Use kmem_cache_alloc_node() with @pool->node instead of kmem_cache_zalloc() when allocating a pool_workqueue so that it's allocated on the same node as the associated worker_pool. As there's no no kmem_cache_zalloc_node(), move zeroing to init_pwq(). This was suggested by Lai Jiangshan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f147f29eb7
commit
e50aba9aea
@ -3626,12 +3626,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
|
||||
/* initialize newly alloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
|
||||
static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
|
||||
struct worker_pool *pool)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
|
||||
|
||||
memset(pwq, 0, sizeof(*pwq));
|
||||
|
||||
pwq->pool = pool;
|
||||
pwq->wq = wq;
|
||||
pwq->flush_color = -1;
|
||||
@ -3677,7 +3679,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
|
||||
if (!pool)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
pwq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL, pool->node);
|
||||
if (!pwq) {
|
||||
put_unbound_pool(pool);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user