forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ACPI: work around duplicate name "VID" problem on T61
This can only fix the problem that more than one video bus device have the same AML name "VID". ie. the proc I/F for the second "VID" video bus device is located under /proc/acpi/video/VID1/... As this is really rare and the ACPI proc I/F is a legacy feature that we are planning to remove. We won't provide a generic solution for this problem. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a8f46100b
commit
e6d9da1de0
@ -1833,6 +1833,7 @@ static void acpi_video_device_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int instance;
|
||||
static int acpi_video_bus_add(struct acpi_device *device)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int result = 0;
|
||||
@ -1847,6 +1848,13 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_add(struct acpi_device *device)
|
||||
if (!video)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
/* a hack to fix the duplicate name "VID" problem on T61 */
|
||||
if (!strcmp(device->pnp.bus_id, "VID")) {
|
||||
if (instance)
|
||||
device->pnp.bus_id[3] = '0' + instance;
|
||||
instance ++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
video->device = device;
|
||||
strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_VIDEO_BUS_NAME);
|
||||
strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_VIDEO_CLASS);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user