forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Document I_SYNC and I_DATASYNC
After some archeology (see http://logfs.org/logfs/inode_state_bits) I finally figured out what the three I_DIRTY bits do. Maybe others would prefer less effort to reach this insight. Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
20420bba13
commit
e7ca2d41a0
|
@ -1279,8 +1279,10 @@ struct super_operations {
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Two bits are used for locking and completion notification, I_LOCK and I_SYNC.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_SYNC Inode itself is dirty.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Data-related inode changes pending
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_SYNC Inode is dirty, but doesn't have to be written on
|
||||
* fdatasync(). i_atime is the usual cause.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Inode is dirty and must be written on fdatasync(), f.e.
|
||||
* because i_size changed.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_PAGES Inode has dirty pages. Inode itself may be clean.
|
||||
* I_NEW get_new_inode() sets i_state to I_LOCK|I_NEW. Both
|
||||
* are cleared by unlock_new_inode(), called from iget().
|
||||
|
@ -1312,8 +1314,6 @@ struct super_operations {
|
|||
* purpose reduces latency and prevents some filesystem-
|
||||
* specific deadlocks.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Q: Why does I_DIRTY_DATASYNC exist? It appears as if it could be replaced
|
||||
* by (I_DIRTY_SYNC|I_DIRTY_PAGES).
|
||||
* Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING?
|
||||
* Q: igrab() only checks on (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE). Should it also check on
|
||||
* I_CLEAR? If not, why?
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user