forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
blk-mq: fix sbitmap ws_active for shared tags
We now wrap sbitmap waitqueues in an active counter, so we can avoid
iterating wakeups unless we have waiters there. This works as long as
everyone that's manipulating the waitqueues use the proper helpers. For
the tag wait case for shared tags, however, we add ourselves to the
waitqueue without incrementing/decrementing the ->ws_active count. This
means that wakeups can take a long time to happen.
Fix this by manually doing the inc/dec as needed for the wait queue
handling.
Reported-by: Michael Leun <kbug@newton.leun.net>
Tested-by: Michael Leun <kbug@newton.leun.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Fixes: 5d2ee7122c
("sbitmap: optimize wakeup check")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e75ad5d8f
commit
e861857545
|
@ -1072,7 +1072,13 @@ static int blk_mq_dispatch_wake(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode,
|
|||
hctx = container_of(wait, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, dispatch_wait);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock);
|
||||
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&wait->entry)) {
|
||||
struct sbitmap_queue *sbq;
|
||||
|
||||
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
|
||||
sbq = &hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
|
||||
atomic_dec(&sbq->ws_active);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
|
||||
|
@ -1088,6 +1094,7 @@ static int blk_mq_dispatch_wake(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode,
|
|||
static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
struct request *rq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sbitmap_queue *sbq = &hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
|
||||
struct wait_queue_head *wq;
|
||||
wait_queue_entry_t *wait;
|
||||
bool ret;
|
||||
|
@ -1110,7 +1117,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
|||
if (!list_empty_careful(&wait->entry))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
wq = &bt_wait_ptr(&hctx->tags->bitmap_tags, hctx)->wait;
|
||||
wq = &bt_wait_ptr(sbq, hctx)->wait;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&wq->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock);
|
||||
|
@ -1120,6 +1127,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_inc(&sbq->ws_active);
|
||||
wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
__add_wait_queue(wq, wait);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1140,6 +1148,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
|||
* someone else gets the wakeup.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&sbq->ws_active);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&wq->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user